ROM ranks 3rd and NUGT 78th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
NUGT vs ROM
ROM −0.20pt a year
1.13%0.93%
NUGT 14.1×the volume
672K47.7K
ROM +44.9pt
−8.3%+36.6%
NUGT vs ROM Performance
+138.7%+126.1%
- NUGT 1.13%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- NUGT $851M
- ROM $1.15B
- NUGT −15.6%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- NUGT 1.00%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- NUGT 10
- ROM 85
- NUGT 672K sh, better
- ROM 47.7K sh
- NUGT $124.24
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUGT | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. NUGT and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUGTD
ROMA
In short
NUGT Gold miners with the volume turned up. NUGT aims for 200% of the daily move of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, a veteran way to press a view on mining shares without margin or an options account.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
NUGT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUGT vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUGT vs ROM Cost
Overpaying NUGT vs ROM
$3,225
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUGT 1.13%
$20,764
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUGT | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,981 | $1,644 | $337 |
| 20 | $7,403 | $6,199 | $1,204 |
| 30 | $20,764 | $17,539 | $3,225 |
- 1.13%NUGT
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
NUGT 84th cheapest of 95 funds
NUGT vs ROM Dividends
- NUGT 1.00%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- NUGT $1.11
- ROM $0.04
- NUGT $0.40
- ROM $0.02
- NUGT Sep 22, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- NUGT Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- NUGT Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
NUGT vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NUGT
- ROM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUGT 85.7%ROM 49.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NUGT 0.88ROM 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- NUGT −73.7%ROM −67.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NUGT 0.61ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 1.13% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.13% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.