SMRF ranks 2nd and NUKZ 5th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.
NUKZ vs SMRF
SMRF −0.20pt a year
0.85%0.65%
NUKZ 11.4×the volume
101K8.82K
NUKZ vs SMRF Performance
−10.8%−15.1%
- NUKZ 0.85%
- SMRF 0.65%, better
- NUKZ $628M
- SMRF $14M
- NUKZ −21.8%
- SMRF
- NUKZ 1.02%
- SMRF
- NUKZ 53
- SMRF 78
- NUKZ 101K sh, better
- SMRF 8.82K sh
- NUKZ $58.67
- SMRF $19.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUKZ | SMRF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | C54 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A79 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B57Higher | C44 |
Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds
Same Category. NUKZ and SMRF are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUKZC
SMRFB
In short
NUKZ A 2024-vintage, rules-based take on the nuclear buildout: one purpose-built index covering the uranium-and-reactor theme in a plain equity ETF. It prices above the category median, but its portfolio build sits in the upper half of the pack.
SMRF Nuclear power meets option-writing. SMRF actively holds about 70 global small-modular-reactor, nuclear and related tech names, then buys and writes options on top to pull income from a famously jumpy theme.
Stated mandate
NUKZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index.
SMRF The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed portfolio of equity securities significantly tied to the Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology Index, together with bought and written options.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUKZ vs SMRF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUKZ vs SMRF Cost
Overpaying NUKZ vs SMRF
$3,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUKZ 0.85%
$16,199
SMRF 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUKZ | SMRF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,163 | $345 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,440 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $12,717 | $3,482 |
- 0.85%NUKZ
- 0.65%SMRF, cheaper
- Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
- Median 0.75%
SMRF 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
NUKZ 8th cheapest of 9 funds
NUKZ vs SMRF Dividends
- NUKZ 1.02%
- SMRF
- NUKZ $0.58
- SMRF
- NUKZ $0.58
- SMRF $0.07
- NUKZ Dec 30, 2025
- SMRF Oct 22, 2026
- NUKZ Dec 31, 2025
- SMRF Oct 27, 2026
- NUKZ Irregular
- SMRF Monthly
Distribution history
NUKZ vs SMRF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUKZ 32.7%SMRF
- Return per unit of risk
- NUKZ 0.93SMRF
- Worst fall
- NUKZ −33.0%SMRF
- Market sensitivity
- NUKZ 1.67SMRF 1.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.52%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.