TSLS ranks 3rd and NVDD 10th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
NVDD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.06pt a year
1.01%0.95%
TSLS 1.6×the volume
194K304K
TSLS +9.0pt
−45.6%−36.6%
NVDD vs TSLS Performance
−2.0%−0.7%
- NVDD 1.01%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- NVDD $21M
- TSLS $44M
- NVDD −2.0%
- TSLS −0.7%, better
- NVDD 3.75%, better
- TSLS 2.99%
- NVDD 4
- TSLS 4
- NVDD 194K sh
- TSLS 304K sh, better
- NVDD $34.81
- TSLS $55.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NVDD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | A87 |
| Risk | B58 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74 | A81Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. NVDD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NVDDA
TSLSA
In short
NVDD A straight one-for-one short on NVIDIA that resets every trading day: no 2x amplifier, no margin account, no hunting for borrowable shares. It also undercuts the other inverse-NVDA ETF on fees.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
NVDD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of NVIDIA Corporation common shares.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NVDD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NVDD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying NVDD vs TSLS
$981
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NVDD 1.01%
$18,850
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NVDD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $6,322 | $364 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $17,869 | $981 |
- 1.01%NVDD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
NVDD 10th cheapest of 43 funds
NVDD vs TSLS Dividends
- NVDD 3.75%, better
- TSLS 2.99%
- NVDD $1.36
- TSLS $1.57
- NVDD $0.49
- TSLS $0.40
- NVDD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- NVDD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- NVDD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
NVDD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NVDD 32.7%, betterTSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- NVDD −2.03TSLS −0.76, better
- Worst fall
- NVDD −89.6%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- NVDD −1.72TSLS −1.37
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.