ORBX ranks 4th and UFO 6th of 15 funds in the Space Category.
ORBX vs UFO
ORBX −0.25pt a year
0.50%0.75%
UFO 14.4×the volume
69.7K1M
ORBX vs UFO Performance
−8.0%−8.1%
- ORBX 0.50%, better
- UFO 0.75%
- ORBX $35M
- UFO $454M
- ORBX
- UFO +7.1%
- ORBX
- UFO 0.38%
- ORBX 37
- UFO 65
- ORBX 69.7K sh
- UFO 1M sh, better
- ORBX $36.48
- UFO $40.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ORBX | UFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71Higher | D29 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D25 | C45Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | B66Higher |
| Durability | B65Higher | B64 |
Rank among Space funds
Same Category. ORBX and UFO are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ORBXC
UFOC
In short
ORBX Space investing usually carries a 0.75% toll. ORBX charges 0.50% for a global basket of roughly 40 companies spanning launch systems, satellites, orbital transport and space tourism. The whole launchpad, not one slice of it.
UFO UFO buys the space economy through a purpose-built benchmark, VettaFi's Space Index (formerly S-Network's), holding roughly 50 companies worldwide instead of leaning on a broad aerospace-and-defense proxy.
Stated mandate
ORBX ORBX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X Space Tech Index. It invests in companies benefiting from commercialization of the global space economy across launch systems, space technology and components, orbital transport, satellite-enabled services, and space exploration or tourism.
UFO The fund aims to track the performance of the VettaFi Space Index, previously known as the S-Network Space Index, before accounting for fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ORBX vs UFO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ORBX vs UFO Cost
Overpaying UFO vs ORBX
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ORBX 0.50%
$9,979
UFO 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ORBX | UFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,336 | $436 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,078 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,482 | $4,503 |
- 0.50%ORBX, cheaper
- 0.75%UFO
- Middle half of Space funds
- Median 0.75%
ORBX 5th cheapest of 15 funds
UFO 8th cheapest of 15 funds
ORBX vs UFO Dividends
- ORBX
- UFO 0.38%
- ORBX None
- UFO $0.15
- ORBX
- UFO $0.0041
- ORBX
- UFO Sep 29, 2026
- ORBX
- UFO Sep 30, 2026
- ORBX
- UFO Quarterly
Distribution history
ORBX vs UFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ORBX UFO 38.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ORBX UFO 0.93
- Worst fall
- ORBX UFO −49.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ORBX 1.30UFO 1.86
ORBX and UFO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


