SIVR ranks 1st and PLTM 3rd of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
PLTM vs SIVR
SIVR −0.20pt a year
0.50%0.30%
SIVR 10.7×the volume
138K1.47M
SIVR +8.7pt
+6.6%+15.3%
PLTM vs SIVR Performance
+37.8%+103.7%
- PLTM 0.50%
- SIVR 0.30%, better
- PLTM $150M
- SIVR $3.45B
- PLTM −9.2%
- SIVR +1.5%, better
- PLTM 0.00%
- SIVR
- PLTM 1
- SIVR 1
- PLTM 138K sh
- SIVR 1.47M sh, better
- PLTM $14.20
- SIVR $47.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PLTM | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A94Higher | A89 |
| Risk | C44Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C42 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C43 | A73Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. PLTM and SIVR are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PLTMB
SIVRA
In short
PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.
SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.
Stated mandate
PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.
SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PLTM vs SIVR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PLTM vs SIVR Cost
Overpaying PLTM vs SIVR
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PLTM 0.50%
$9,979
SIVR 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PLTM | SIVR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $545 | $355 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,113 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $6,149 | $3,830 |
- 0.50%PLTM
- 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SIVR cheapest of 9 funds
PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
PLTM vs SIVR Dividends
- PLTM 0.00%
- SIVR
- PLTM None
- SIVR None
Distribution history
PLTM vs SIVR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PLTM
- SIVR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PLTM 33.0%, betterSIVR 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PLTM 0.44SIVR 0.75, better
- Worst fall
- PLTM −48.4%, betterSIVR −57.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PLTM 0.55SIVR 1.26
PLTM and SIVR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



