PTBD ranks 3rd and TDSC 15th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs TDSC
PTBD −0.26pt a year
0.60%0.86%
PTBD 2.1×the volume
18.6K8.87K
TDSC +4.1pt
−1.7%+2.4%
PTBD vs TDSC Performance
−8.3%+12.4%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- TDSC 0.86%
- PTBD $83M
- TDSC $104M
- PTBD −0.2%
- TDSC +14.3%, better
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- TDSC 1.32%
- PTBD 1050
- TDSC 11
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- TDSC 8.87K sh
- PTBD $18.34
- TDSC $28.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | TDSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | B62 |
| Mission | B61 | |
| Risk | B60 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | C41 |
| Durability | A83Higher | A70 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and TDSC are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
TDSCB
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
TDSC Most funds bury risk in the disclosures; this one puts it in the name. TDSC steers toward a 10% peak-to-trough drawdown target, with an algorithm rotating among stocks, bonds, real estate, currencies and commodities and cash as its hatch.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
TDSC The Fund seeks long-term growth while managing its portfolio toward a specified drawdown, or targeted downside-risk, parameter.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs TDSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs TDSC Cost
Overpaying TDSC vs PTBD
$4,551
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
TDSC 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | TDSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,525 | $449 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $5,768 | $1,652 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $16,368 | $4,551 |
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- 0.86%TDSC
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
TDSC 18th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs TDSC Dividends
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- TDSC 1.32%
- PTBD $1.17
- TDSC $0.37
- PTBD $0.10
- TDSC $0.11
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- TDSC Sep 28, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- TDSC Sep 30, 2026
- PTBD Monthly
- TDSC Quarterly
Distribution history
PTBD vs TDSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PTBD
- TDSC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%, betterTDSC 9.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08TDSC 0.81, better
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.8%TDSC −21.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74TDSC 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.