GMOD ranks 2nd and TDSC 15th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
GMOD vs TDSC
GMOD −0.36pt a year
0.50%0.86%
GMOD 1.3×the volume
11.8K8.87K
GMOD vs TDSC Performance
+12.1%+14.3%
- GMOD 0.50%, better
- TDSC 0.86%
- GMOD $51M
- TDSC $104M
- GMOD +12.1%
- TDSC +14.3%, better
- GMOD
- TDSC 1.32%
- GMOD 19
- TDSC 11
- GMOD 11.8K sh, better
- TDSC 8.87K sh
- GMOD $27.77
- TDSC $28.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOD | TDSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A74Higher | B61 |
| Risk | A75Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C41 |
| Durability | C49 | A70Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. GMOD and TDSC are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMODA
TDSCB
In short
GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.
TDSC Most funds bury risk in the disclosures; this one puts it in the name. TDSC steers toward a 10% peak-to-trough drawdown target, with an algorithm rotating among stocks, bonds, real estate, currencies and commodities and cash as its hatch.
Stated mandate
GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.
TDSC The Fund seeks long-term growth while managing its portfolio toward a specified drawdown, or targeted downside-risk, parameter.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOD vs TDSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOD vs TDSC Cost
Overpaying TDSC vs GMOD
$6,389
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOD 0.50%
$9,979
TDSC 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOD | TDSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,525 | $625 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,768 | $2,308 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $16,368 | $6,389 |
- 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
- 0.86%TDSC
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds
TDSC 18th cheapest of 46 funds
GMOD vs TDSC Dividends
- GMOD
- TDSC 1.32%
- GMOD
- TDSC $0.37
- GMOD $0.14
- TDSC $0.11
- GMOD Jun 30, 2026
- TDSC Sep 28, 2026
- GMOD Jul 1, 2026
- TDSC Sep 30, 2026
- GMOD Twice a year
- TDSC Quarterly
Distribution history
GMOD vs TDSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOD 8.7%TDSC 9.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOD 0.89TDSC 0.81
- Worst fall
- GMOD −6.5%TDSC −21.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GMOD 0.48TDSC 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.