Skip to content

GMOD vs TDSC

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF

TDSCBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GMOD −0.36pt a year

GMOD0.50%TDSC0.86%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 1.3×the volume

GMOD11.8KTDSC8.87K

GMOD vs TDSC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+12.1%GMOD+14.3%TDSC

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. GMOD +12.1%. TDSC +14.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GMOD 0.50%, better
TDSC 0.86%
Fund size
GMOD $51M
TDSC $104M
1Y total return
GMOD +12.1%
TDSC +14.3%, better
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
TDSC 1.32%
Holdings
GMOD 19
TDSC 11
Avg volume (30D)
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
TDSC 8.87K sh
NAV per share
GMOD $27.77
TDSC $28.62
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49. TDSC: Cost 62, Risk 62, Mission 61, Tradability 52, Holdings 41, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMOD, TDSC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMODTDSC
Cost30% weightA90HigherB62
Mission25% weightA74HigherB61
Risk15% weightA75HigherB62
Tradability15% weightA73HigherC52
Holdings10% weightB64HigherC41
Durability5% weightC49A70Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMOD and TDSC are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and TDSC 15th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 14BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 15BTDSCETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 16BBDGSBridges Capital Tactical ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

TDSCBETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF

In short

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

TDSC Most funds bury risk in the disclosures; this one puts it in the name. TDSC steers toward a 10% peak-to-trough drawdown target, with an algorithm rotating among stocks, bonds, real estate, currencies and commodities and cash as its hatch.

Stated mandate

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

TDSC The Fund seeks long-term growth while managing its portfolio toward a specified drawdown, or targeted downside-risk, parameter.

Why people hold it

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.
  • TDSC Risk is defined upfront: the mandate is long-term growth managed toward a 10% drawdown target, with drawdown measured on monthly returns from a rolling high-water mark.sec.govthecabanagroup.com
  • 0.86% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, which sits below the median fee in its tactical allocation category.
  • Five asset classes, one dial: equities, bonds, real estate, currencies and commodities, with signals that can move the portfolio to cash or cash equivalents in sharp downturns.sec.gov
  • Trading since 2020, so the algorithm has a live public record, not just a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.
  • TDSC The 10% figure is a target, not a floor. The prospectus states it may not be maintained, and losses can run past it.sec.gov
  • Thinly traded next to big index funds, so spreads and order type matter more here.
  • Fee ceiling: the gross rate is 0.97%, where the cost lands if the waiver lapses after August 31, 2027. Cheaper tactical options exist, such as ENDW at 0.22%.

Full GMOD profile⁠

Full TDSC profile⁠

GMOD vs TDSC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMOD vs TDSC Cost

Overpaying TDSC vs GMOD

$6,389

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

  • TDSC 0.86%

    $16,368

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMOD 0.50%
  • TDSC 0.86%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TDSC $16,368GMOD $9,979

Year by year

YearGMODTDSCOverpaying
10$900$1,525$625
20$3,460$5,768$2,308
30$9,979$16,368$6,389

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GMOD, cheaper
  • 0.86%TDSC
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

TDSC 18th cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD vs TDSC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMOD No data
TDSC 1.32%
Payout (12M)
GMOD No data
TDSC $0.37
Last payment
GMOD $0.14
TDSC $0.11
Ex-dividend
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
TDSC Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
TDSC Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
GMOD Twice a year
TDSC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
TDSCQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll TDSC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2020 $0.13; Dec 30, 2021 $0.31; Mar 25, 2022 $0.01; Jun 24, 2022 $0.05; Sep 27, 2022 $0.08; Dec 27, 2022 $0.24; Jun 27, 2023 $0.07; Sep 26, 2023 $0.12; Dec 26, 2023 $0.29; Mar 25, 2024 $0.07; Jun 24, 2024 $0.03; Sep 24, 2024 $0.08; Dec 30, 2024 $0.32; Mar 26, 2025 $0.23; Jun 26, 2025 $0.20; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Mar 27, 2026 $0.06; Jun 26, 2026 $0.08; Sep 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

GMOD vs TDSC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025TDSC 9.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025TDSC 0.81
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025TDSC −21.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMOD 0.48TDSC 0.76

Popular comparisons

  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TDSCBvsENDWA

    ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TDSCBvsPTBDA

    ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TDSCBvsRISNA

    ETC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.