QEMM ranks 4th and TLTE 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
QEMM vs TLTE
QEMM −0.27pt a year
0.30%0.57%
TLTE 1.7×the volume
3.81K6.52K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+7.3%+7.3%
QEMM vs TLTE Performance
+38.7%+37.6%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- TLTE 0.57%
- QEMM $54M
- TLTE $312M
- QEMM +18.4%, better
- TLTE +13.2%
- QEMM 4.62%, better
- TLTE 3.57%
- QEMM 836
- TLTE 2943
- QEMM 3.81K sh
- TLTE 6.52K sh, better
- QEMM $73.94
- TLTE $67.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QEMM | TLTE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | F16 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A71Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | D37Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | B55 | B57Higher |
| Durability | C52 | B63Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. QEMM and TLTE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QEMMB
TLTED
In short
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
TLTE Most emerging-market factor funds cut the universe down to a few hundred names. TLTE keeps roughly 3,000 stocks and simply leans the weights toward small-cap and value. A tilt, not a screen.
Stated mandate
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
TLTE The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, providing exposure to emerging-market stocks with an emphasis on small-capitalization and value characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QEMM vs TLTE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QEMM vs TLTE Cost
Overpaying TLTE vs QEMM
$5,122
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
TLTE 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QEMM | TLTE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,023 | $478 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,921 | $1,808 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $11,271 | $5,122 |
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- 0.57%TLTE
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
TLTE 17th cheapest of 20 funds
QEMM vs TLTE Dividends
- QEMM 4.62%, better
- TLTE 3.57%
- QEMM $3.52
- TLTE $2.50
- QEMM $1.05
- TLTE $0.58
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- TLTE Sep 18, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- TLTE Sep 24, 2026
- QEMM Twice a year
- TLTE Quarterly
Distribution history
QEMM vs TLTE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QEMM
- TLTE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QEMM 13.3%, betterTLTE 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QEMM 1.00, betterTLTE 0.93
- Worst fall
- QEMM −27.1%, betterTLTE −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- QEMM 0.95TLTE 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.