QLD ranks 1st and UJB 7th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UJB
QLD −0.06pt a year
0.89%0.95%
QLD 301.7×the volume
4.15M13.7K
QLD +27.2pt
+32.0%+4.8%
QLD vs UJB Performance
+89.5%+9.4%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UJB 0.95%
- QLD $13.3B
- UJB $10M
- QLD +7.6%, better
- UJB −1.2%
- QLD 0.15%
- UJB 3.35%, better
- QLD 113
- UJB 2
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UJB 13.7K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UJB $74.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UJB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | C51 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A100Higher | A82 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UJB are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UJBB
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UJB Leverage, but on junk bonds instead of stocks. UJB aims for twice the daily move of the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, a credit trade sitting in a category stuffed with 2x Nasdaq and 2x tech.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UJB UJB seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UJB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UJB Cost
Overpaying UJB vs QLD
$997
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UJB 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UJB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,678 | $102 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,322 | $369 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $17,869 | $997 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.95%UJB
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UJB 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UJB Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UJB 3.35%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UJB $2.49
- QLD $0.03
- UJB $0.81
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UJB Sep 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UJB Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UJB Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UJB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UJB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%UJB 9.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUJB 0.75
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%UJB −30.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UJB 1.39
QLD and UJB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
