ROM ranks 3rd and UJB 7th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UJB
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.93%0.95%
ROM 3.5×the volume
47.7K13.7K
ROM +31.4pt
+36.2%+4.8%
ROM vs UJB Performance
+110.3%+9.4%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UJB 0.95%
- ROM $1.15B
- UJB $10M
- ROM +19.3%, better
- UJB −1.2%
- ROM 0.03%
- UJB 3.35%, better
- ROM 85
- UJB 2
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- UJB 13.7K sh
- ROM $132.18
- UJB $74.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UJB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C51 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | A82 |
| Holdings | B66 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B63 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UJB are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UJBB
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UJB Leverage, but on junk bonds instead of stocks. UJB aims for twice the daily move of the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, a credit trade sitting in a category stuffed with 2x Nasdaq and 2x tech.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UJB UJB seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UJB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UJB Cost
Overpaying UJB vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UJB 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UJB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,322 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $17,869 | $330 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.95%UJB
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UJB 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UJB Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UJB 3.35%, better
- ROM $0.04
- UJB $2.49
- ROM $0.02
- UJB $0.81
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UJB Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UJB Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UJB Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UJB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROM
- UJB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%UJB 9.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97, betterUJB 0.75
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%UJB −30.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UJB 1.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.