Skip to content
etf.net

QQQU vs ROM

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF

QQQUCNYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Overlap

17.7%by weight

Expense ratio

ROM −0.05pt a year

QQQU0.98%ROM0.93%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 1.3×the volume

QQQU37.8KROM47.7K

QQQU vs ROM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−4.7%QQQU+26.5%ROM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. QQQU −4.7%. ROM +26.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%40%60%Oct 2025May 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QQQU 0.98%
ROM 0.93%, better
Fund size
QQQU $70M
ROM $1.15B
1Y total return
QQQU −4.7%
ROM +26.5%, better
Yield (12M)
QQQU 9.56%, better
ROM 0.03%
Holdings
QQQU 13
ROM 85
Avg volume (30D)
QQQU 37.8K sh
ROM 47.7K sh, better
NAV per share
QQQU $58.23
ROM $132.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QQQU: Cost 29, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 62. ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for QQQU, ROM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQQQUROM
Cost30% weightD29A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45B56Higher
Tradability15% weightB55A88Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB62A81Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QQQU and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and QQQU 36th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 35CGLDWRoundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 36CQQQUDirexion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 37CCIFCCorgi CIFR 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QQQUCDirexion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

In short

QQQU Most leveraged funds amplify a whole index. QQQU levers seven names: it targets 200% of the Magnificent 7 basket's daily move, and Direxion runs an inverse sibling on the same index for the other side.

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

Stated mandate

QQQU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index.

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

  • QQQU Targets 200% of the daily move of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, a fixed roster of leading Nasdaq-listed mega-caps, not a 100-stock benchmark.direxion.com
  • 0.98% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.00% gross), near the leveraged-bull median. QLD is cheaper at 0.89% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • A 2x dose, not 3x, and paired with a -1x twin on the identical index, so long and short views run on the same benchmark.direxion.com
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded leveraged-bull field, and pays out quarterly.
  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

Worth knowing

  • QQQU Leverage resets daily. Held longer than a day, results can drift from 2x the index's cumulative move, and choppy markets compound that gap.direxion.com
  • Seven stocks, doubled: one earnings night at a single mega-cap can swing the whole fund.
  • Smaller and more thinly traded than the headline index-based leveraged ETFs, so spreads and order size deserve a look before you click.
  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

Full QQQU profile⁠

Full ROM profile⁠

QQQU vs ROM Holdings

How QQQU and ROM differ

Overlap by weight

17.7%

Shared holdings make up 26.2% of ROM and 17.7% of QQQU.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both17.7%
  • Sector5 Sectors46.1%
  • Countryby domicile99.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in QQQU and ROM, widest gap first
SectorMore in QQQUMore in ROM
TechnologyROM +49.0 points
CommunicationQQQU +29.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQQQU +24.9 points
FinancialsROM +4.8 points
EnergyROM +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QQQU and ROM, widest gap first
CountryMore in QQQUMore in ROM
United StatesQQQU +0.6 points
Other countries (2)ROM +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QQQU95.1%
  • ROM70.0%

Securities held

  • QQQU9
  • ROM84

Asset class

QQQU
Equity
ROM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QQQU6
  • In both3
  • Only in ROM81

Only in QQQU

6 securities, 29.0% of QQQU by weight

  • Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5066.39%
  • Tesla Inc6.24%
  • Amazon.com Inc5.61%

Only in ROM

81 securities, 44.7% of ROM by weight

  • Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf3.23%
  • Broadcom Inc2.94%
  • Advanced Micro Devices2.83%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in QQQU and ROM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in QQQUMore in ROM
NVIDIA CorpNVDAROM +3.91 points
Apple IncAAPLROM +3.51 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTROM +1.10 points

All 13 QQQU holdings⁠All 80 ROM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QQQU vs ROM Cost

Overpaying QQQU vs ROM

$823

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QQQU 0.98%

    $18,362

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QQQU 0.98%
  • ROM 0.93%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QQQU $18,362ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearQQQUROMOverpaying
10$1,729$1,644$85
20$6,504$6,199$305
30$18,362$17,539$823

Expense ratio

  • 0.98%QQQU
  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

QQQU 71st cheapest of 95 funds

QQQU vs ROM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QQQU 9.56%, better
ROM 0.03%
Payout (12M)
QQQU $5.37
ROM $0.04
Last payment
QQQU $0.02
ROM $0.02
Ex-dividend
QQQU Jun 23, 2026
ROM Mar 25, 2026
Paid on
QQQU Jun 30, 2026
ROM Mar 31, 2026
Frequency
QQQU Quarterly
ROM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QQQUQuarterly · 10 paymentsAll QQQU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2024 $0.07; Sep 24, 2024 $0.09; Dec 12, 2024 $1.09; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 25, 2025 $0.05; Jun 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 10, 2025 $5.31; Dec 23, 2025 $0.0098; Mar 24, 2026 $0.03; Jun 23, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

QQQU vs ROM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QQQU 44.5%since Apr 2024ROM 49.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QQQU 0.89since Apr 2024ROM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QQQU −53.7%since Mar 2024ROM −67.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QQQU 3.09ROM 3.09Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • QQQUCvsQLDA

    Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQQUCvsUYGA

    Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQQUCvsDDMB

    Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.