ROM ranks 3rd and QQUP 25th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QQUP vs ROM
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.93%
ROM 16.4×the volume
2.9K47.7K
QQUP vs ROM Performance
−7.0%+26.5%
- QQUP 0.95%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- QQUP $23M
- ROM $1.15B
- QQUP −7.0%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- QQUP 0.66%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- QQUP 9
- ROM 85
- QQUP 2.9K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- QQUP $58.28
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQUP | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQUP and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQUPC
ROMA
In short
QQUP Most 2x Nasdaq funds own all 100 names. QQUP targets twice the daily move of only the mega-cap top slice, with membership set by index rules rather than a frozen Mag 7 list.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
QQUP The fund targets two times the daily returns of the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQUP vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQUP vs ROM Cost
Overpaying QQUP vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQUP 0.95%
$17,869
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQUP | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,644 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,199 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,539 | $330 |
- 0.95%QQUP
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
QQUP 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
QQUP vs ROM Dividends
- QQUP 0.66%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- QQUP $0.39
- ROM $0.04
- QQUP $0.08
- ROM $0.02
- QQUP Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- QQUP Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- QQUP Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
QQUP vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQUP 46.7%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQUP 0.60ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- QQUP −37.7%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QQUP 3.46ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.