Skip to content
etf.net

RAM vs ROM

Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF

RAMDCboe

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.57pt a year

RAM1.50%ROM0.93%

Avg volume · 30D

RAM 282.8×the volume

RAM13.5MROM47.7K

RAM vs ROM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−21.6%RAM+2.0%ROM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. RAM −21.6%. ROM +2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RAM 1.50%
ROM 0.93%, better
Fund size
RAM $378M
ROM $1.15B
1Y total return
RAM No data
ROM +26.5%
Yield (12M)
RAM No data
ROM 0.03%
Holdings
RAM 1
ROM 85
Avg volume (30D)
RAM 13.5M sh, better
ROM 47.7K sh
NAV per share
RAM $8.19
ROM $132.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RAM: Cost 6, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 51. ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for RAM, ROM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRAMROM
Cost30% weightF6A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF14B56Higher
Tradability15% weightA78A88Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC51A81Higher

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RAM and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and RAM 88th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 86DTARKTradr 2X Long Innovation ETFScore 28
  6. Rank 88DRAMRoundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETFScore 27
  7. Rank 89DUBOTDirexion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 2X ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RAMDRoundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

In short

RAM No data

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

Stated mandate

RAM No data

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

RAM No data

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com

Worth knowing

RAM No data

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.

Full RAM profile⁠

Full ROM profile⁠

RAM vs ROM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RAM vs ROM Cost

Overpaying RAM vs ROM

$8,744

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RAM 1.50%

    $26,283

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RAM 1.50%
  • ROM 0.93%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530RAM $26,283ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearRAMROMOverpaying
10$2,590$1,644$946
20$9,519$6,199$3,320
30$26,283$17,539$8,744

Expense ratio

  • 1.50%RAM
  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

RAM 94th cheapest of 95 funds

RAM vs ROM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RAM No data
ROM 0.03%
Payout (12M)
RAM None
ROM $0.04
Last payment
RAM No data
ROM $0.02
Ex-dividend
RAM No data
ROM Mar 25, 2026
Paid on
RAM No data
ROM Mar 31, 2026
Frequency
RAM No data
ROM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RAMAll RAM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

RAM vs ROM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RAM No dataROM 49.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RAM No dataROM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RAM No dataROM −67.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RAM 0.00ROM 3.09

RAM and ROM in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • RAMDvsQLDA

    Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RAMDvsUYGA

    Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RAMDvsDDMB

    Roundhill T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.