Skip to content
etf.net

RCTR vs TNUK

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

RCTRBNYSE Arca

Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF

TNUKCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RCTR −0.05pt a year

RCTR0.70%TNUK0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

RCTR 5.8×the volume

RCTR4.45KTNUK763

RCTR vs TNUK Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−6.5%RCTR−16.2%TNUK

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. RCTR −6.5%. TNUK −16.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
RCTR 0.70%, better
TNUK 0.75%
Fund size
RCTR $29M
TNUK $1M
1Y total return
RCTR −15.7%
TNUK No data
Holdings
RCTR 49
TNUK 26
Avg volume (30D)
RCTR 4.45K sh, better
TNUK 763 sh
NAV per share
RCTR $30.28
TNUK $20.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RCTR: Cost 62, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 71, Durability 51. TNUK: Cost 42, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 55, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for RCTR, TNUK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRCTRTNUK
Cost30% weightB62HigherC42
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA70HigherB55
Tradability15% weightC45HigherD27
Holdings10% weightA71HigherB55
Durability5% weightC51HigherD33

Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RCTR and TNUK are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Uranium & Nuclear⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

RCTR ranks 3rd and TNUK 7th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.

  1. Rank 1ANLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BSMRFALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BRCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4BURAGlobal X Uranium ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 6CURNMSprott Uranium Miners ETFScore 41
  6. Rank 7CTNUKTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 8DURNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RCTRBFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

TNUKCTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF

In short

RCTR No data

TNUK Most nuclear funds stop at the uranium miners. TNUK buys the whole chain: the diggers, the reactor designers and builders, and the crews that operate them, anywhere in the world. A December 2025 arrival priced right at the category midpoint.

Stated mandate

RCTR No data

TNUK The Fund seeks total return by investing in companies across the nuclear energy value chain, including uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and nuclear reactor operation and maintenance.

Why people hold it

RCTR No data

  • TNUK Covers the full nuclear value chain: uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and reactor operation and maintenance, not just the fuel end.
  • The 0.75% expense ratio sits exactly at the median for uranium and nuclear funds, and under Range's NUKZ at 0.85%.
  • Global by mandate, which matters when much of the reactor-building and utility side of the industry sits outside the US.
  • Plain equity fund in a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper. No leverage, no swaps, no outcome period to track.

Worth knowing

RCTR No data

  • TNUK Launched in December 2025, so there is no long track record, and it is a small fund next to category veterans like URA and NLR.
  • Trades lightly compared with the category's heavyweights, so spreads can be wide and limit orders do real work here.
  • The mandate is total return, and the fund has not been making distributions. Income is not the job.

Full RCTR profile⁠

Full TNUK profile⁠

RCTR vs TNUK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RCTR vs TNUK Cost

Overpaying TNUK vs RCTR

$876

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RCTR 0.70%

    $13,606

  • TNUK 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RCTR 0.70%
  • TNUK 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TNUK $14,482RCTR $13,606

Year by year

YearRCTRTNUKOverpaying
10$1,250$1,336$86
20$4,760$5,078$318
30$13,606$14,482$876

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%RCTR, cheaper
  • 0.75%TNUK
  • Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
  • Median 0.75%

RCTR 4th cheapest of 9 funds

TNUK 5th cheapest of 9 funds

RCTR vs TNUK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
RCTR No data
TNUK None
Last payment
RCTR $0.06
TNUK No data
Ex-dividend
RCTR Sep 24, 2026
TNUK No data
Paid on
RCTR Sep 30, 2026
TNUK No data
Frequency
RCTR Quarterly
TNUK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

RCTRQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll RCTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 12, 2025 $0.12; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.07; Sep 24, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
TNUKAll TNUK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RCTR vs TNUK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RCTR 24.8%since Aug 2025TNUK No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RCTR −0.02since Aug 2025TNUK No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RCTR −22.3%since Jul 2025TNUK No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RCTR 1.11TNUK 1.06

Popular comparisons

  • RCTRBvsNLRA

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TNUKCvsNLRA

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RCTRBvsSMRFB

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TNUKCvsSMRFB

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RCTRBvsURAB

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TNUKCvsURAB

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.