NLR ranks 1st and TNUK 7th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.
NLR vs TNUK
NLR −0.23pt a year
0.52%0.75%
NLR 534.3×the volume
408K763
NLR vs TNUK Performance
−26.1%−15.7%
- NLR 0.52%, better
- TNUK 0.75%
- NLR $3.1B
- TNUK $1M
- NLR −39.4%
- TNUK
- NLR 3.45%
- TNUK
- NLR 28
- TNUK 26
- NLR 408K sh, better
- TNUK 763 sh
- NLR $92.14
- TNUK $21.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NLR | TNUK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | C42 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C54 | B55Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | D33 |
Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds
Same Category. NLR and TNUK are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NLRA
TNUKC
In short
NLR The original nuclear ETF, listed since 2007. NLR owns the whole chain (uranium miners, reactor builders, nuclear utilities, and the equipment firms serving them) at a lower fee than most of its rivals.
TNUK Most nuclear funds stop at the uranium miners. TNUK buys the whole chain: the diggers, the reactor designers and builders, and the crews that operate them, anywhere in the world. A December 2025 arrival priced right at the category midpoint.
Stated mandate
NLR The fund seeks to track the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index before fees and expenses. The index covers companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear-facility and reactor construction, engineering and maintenance, nuclear electricity generation, and nuclear-industry equipment, technology, or services.
TNUK The Fund seeks total return by investing in companies across the nuclear energy value chain, including uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and nuclear reactor operation and maintenance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NLR vs TNUK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NLR vs TNUK Cost
Overpaying TNUK vs NLR
$4,131
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NLR 0.52%
$10,351
TNUK 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NLR | TNUK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $1,336 | $401 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $5,078 | $1,485 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $14,482 | $4,131 |
- 0.52%NLR, cheaper
- 0.75%TNUK
- Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
- Median 0.75%
NLR cheapest of 9 funds
TNUK 5th cheapest of 9 funds
NLR vs TNUK Dividends
- NLR 3.45%
- TNUK
- NLR $3.17
- TNUK None
- NLR $3.17
- TNUK
- NLR Dec 22, 2025
- TNUK
- NLR Dec 26, 2025
- TNUK
- NLR Annual
- TNUK
Distribution history
NLR vs TNUK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NLR 35.9%TNUK
- Return per unit of risk
- NLR 0.37TNUK
- Worst fall
- NLR −45.0%TNUK
- Market sensitivity
- NLR 1.07TNUK 1.06
NLR and TNUK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




