Skip to content

SMRF vs TNUK

ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

SMRFBNYSE Arca

Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF

TNUKCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SMRF −0.10pt a year

SMRF0.65%TNUK0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

SMRF 11.6×the volume

SMRF8.82KTNUK763

SMRF vs TNUK Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−17.3%SMRF−10.0%TNUK

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. SMRF −17.3%. TNUK −10.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%10%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
SMRF 0.65%, better
TNUK 0.75%
Fund size
SMRF $14M
TNUK $1M
Holdings
SMRF 78
TNUK 26
Avg volume (30D)
SMRF 8.82K sh, better
TNUK 763 sh
NAV per share
SMRF $19.43
TNUK $20.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SMRF: Cost 78, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 81, Durability 44. TNUK: Cost 42, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings 55, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for SMRF, TNUK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSMRFTNUK
Cost30% weightA78HigherC42
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC50B55Higher
Tradability15% weightB59HigherD27
Holdings10% weightA81HigherB55
Durability5% weightC44HigherD33

Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SMRF and TNUK are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Uranium & Nuclear⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SMRF ranks 2nd and TNUK 7th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.

  1. Rank 1ANLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BSMRFALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BRCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 6CURNMSprott Uranium Miners ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 7CTNUKTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 8DURNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SMRFBALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

TNUKCTortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF

In short

SMRF Nuclear power meets option-writing. SMRF actively holds about 70 global small-modular-reactor, nuclear and related tech names, then buys and writes options on top to pull income from a famously jumpy theme.

TNUK Most nuclear funds stop at the uranium miners. TNUK buys the whole chain: the diggers, the reactor designers and builders, and the crews that operate them, anywhere in the world. A December 2025 arrival priced right at the category midpoint.

Stated mandate

SMRF The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed portfolio of equity securities significantly tied to the Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology Index, together with bought and written options.

TNUK The Fund seeks total return by investing in companies across the nuclear energy value chain, including uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and nuclear reactor operation and maintenance.

Why people hold it

  • SMRF Charges 0.65% a year, under the median for its options-income peer group and below names like HYGW (0.69%) and SVOL (0.66%).
  • One wrapper, two jobs: the fund seeks capital appreciation and income, pairing the stock sleeve with bought and written options.
  • Actively managed around the Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology Index rather than bolted to it, so the manager sets the option book.
  • Spreads across roughly 70 global holdings instead of a handful of pure-play reactor startups, and the income policy targets a relatively stable payout level.
  • TNUK Covers the full nuclear value chain: uranium mining and milling, reactor design and construction, and reactor operation and maintenance, not just the fuel end.
  • The 0.75% expense ratio sits exactly at the median for uranium and nuclear funds, and under Range's NUKZ at 0.85%.
  • Global by mandate, which matters when much of the reactor-building and utility side of the industry sits outside the US.
  • Plain equity fund in a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper. No leverage, no swaps, no outcome period to track.

Worth knowing

  • SMRF Written calls trade away part of a big rally for premium today. In a runaway nuclear melt-up, the option book is the brake.
  • Launched in 2026 with a small asset base and thin trading, so spreads can run wider than in the giants of the category.
  • A single-theme portfolio tied to reactors, uranium and power-hungry tech moves on policy and project news, and swings harder than a broad index.
  • TNUK Launched in December 2025, so there is no long track record, and it is a small fund next to category veterans like URA and NLR.
  • Trades lightly compared with the category's heavyweights, so spreads can be wide and limit orders do real work here.
  • The mandate is total return, and the fund has not been making distributions. Income is not the job.

Full SMRF profile⁠

Full TNUK profile⁠

SMRF vs TNUK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SMRF vs TNUK Cost

Overpaying TNUK vs SMRF

$1,765

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SMRF 0.65%

    $12,717

  • TNUK 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SMRF 0.65%
  • TNUK 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TNUK $14,482SMRF $12,717

Year by year

YearSMRFTNUKOverpaying
10$1,163$1,336$173
20$4,440$5,078$638
30$12,717$14,482$1,765

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%SMRF, cheaper
  • 0.75%TNUK
  • Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
  • Median 0.75%

SMRF 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

TNUK 5th cheapest of 9 funds

SMRF vs TNUK Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
SMRF No data
TNUK None
Last payment
SMRF $0.07
TNUK No data
Ex-dividend
SMRF Oct 22, 2026
TNUK No data
Paid on
SMRF Oct 27, 2026
TNUK No data
Frequency
SMRF Monthly
TNUK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

SMRFMonthly · 6 paymentsAll SMRF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments in 2026 YTD. May 21, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Jul 16, 2026 $0.07; Aug 20, 2026 $0.07; Sep 17, 2026 $0.07; Oct 22, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD
TNUKAll TNUK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SMRF vs TNUK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SMRF 1.98TNUK 1.06

Popular comparisons

  • SMRFBvsNLRA

    ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TNUKCvsNLRA

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMRFBvsRCTRB

    ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TNUKCvsRCTRB

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMRFBvsURAB

    ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TNUKCvsURAB

    Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · Global X Uranium ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.