ROM ranks 3rd and TARK 86th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs TARK
ROM −0.55pt a year
0.93%1.48%
ROM 2.2×the volume
47.7K22.1K
ROM +16.3pt
+44.2%+27.9%
ROM vs TARK Performance
+19.3%−37.6%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- TARK 1.48%
- ROM $1.15B
- TARK $11M
- ROM +19.3%, better
- TARK −37.6%
- ROM 0.03%
- TARK 35.39%, better
- ROM 85
- TARK 2
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- TARK 22.1K sh
- ROM $132.18
- TARK $41.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | TARK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | D28 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | C49 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and TARK are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
TARKD
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
TARK Most leveraged ETFs double an index. TARK doubles a stock picker: it targets 2x the daily move of ARKK, ARK's actively managed innovation fund, in one ticker. Costs 1.48% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027, with leverage reset daily.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
TARK The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily performance of the ARK Innovation ETF. It targets this result for one trading day only.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs TARK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs TARK Cost
Overpaying TARK vs ROM
$8,460
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
TARK 1.48%
$25,999
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | TARK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $2,558 | $914 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $9,408 | $3,209 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $25,999 | $8,460 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 1.48%TARK
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
TARK 92nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs TARK Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- TARK 35.39%, better
- ROM $0.04
- TARK $14.71
- ROM $0.02
- TARK $14.71
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- TARK Dec 23, 2025
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- TARK Dec 26, 2025
- ROM Quarterly
- TARK Annual
Distribution history
ROM vs TARK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%, betterTARK 83.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97, betterTARK 0.69
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%TARK −77.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09TARK 5.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.48% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.