ROM ranks 3rd and TBXU 70th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs TBXU
ROM −0.05pt a year
0.93%0.98%
ROM 12.8×the volume
47.7K3.73K
ROM vs TBXU Performance
+26.5%+68.1%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- TBXU 0.98%
- ROM $1.15B
- TBXU $3M
- ROM +26.5%
- TBXU +68.1%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- TBXU
- ROM 85
- TBXU 11
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- TBXU 3.73K sh
- ROM $132.18
- TBXU $43.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | TBXU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | D29 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | C44 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and TBXU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
TBXUD
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
TBXU Leveraged biotech, boiled down to five names. TBXU targets 200% of the daily move in an equal-weight basket of the largest US-listed biotechs, at 0.98% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
TBXU The fund seeks daily results equal to 200% of the NYSE Biotechnology Top 5 Equal Weight Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs TBXU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs TBXU Cost
Overpaying TBXU vs ROM
$823
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
TBXU 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | TBXU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,729 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,504 | $305 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $18,362 | $823 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.98%TBXU
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
TBXU 71st cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs TBXU Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- TBXU
- ROM $0.04
- TBXU
- ROM $0.02
- TBXU $0.14
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- TBXU Sep 22, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- TBXU Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- TBXU Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs TBXU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%TBXU 40.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97TBXU 1.39
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%TBXU −26.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09TBXU −0.18
ROM and TBXU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
