Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs TEXU

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF

TEXUDNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ROM −0.05pt a year

ROM0.93%TEXU0.98%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 12.4×the volume

ROM47.7KTEXU3.84K

ROM vs TEXU Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+26.5%ROM+114.8%TEXU

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ROM +26.5%. TEXU +114.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%75%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%, better
TEXU 0.98%
Fund size
ROM $1.15B
TEXU $3M
1Y total return
ROM +26.5%
TEXU +114.8%, better
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
TEXU No data
Holdings
ROM 85
TEXU 11
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 47.7K sh, better
TEXU 3.84K sh
NAV per share
ROM $132.18
TEXU $46.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. TEXU: Cost 29, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 44.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, TEXU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMTEXU
Cost30% weightA70HigherD29
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56B65Higher
Tradability15% weightA88HigherD30
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherC44

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and TEXU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and TEXU 71st of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 71DEZJProShares Ultra MSCI JapanScore 38
  6. Rank 71DTEXUDirexion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 71DUPLTProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

TEXUDDirexion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

TEXU Direxion's Titans line sits between a broad sector bet and a single stock: TEXU aims for 200% of the daily move of an equal-weighted index of the five largest S&P 500 energy names. It resets every day.

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

TEXU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Energy (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com
  • TEXU Concentrated, but spread across five names: the index holds the top five S&P 500 energy companies at equal weight with caps, so no one ticker runs the whole basket.direxion.comdirexion.com 2
  • Fee of 0.98% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (gross 8.25%), near the leveraged-bull median and close to long-running peers ROM and UYG at 0.93%.
  • Direxion states the mechanics plainly: 200% of the index for a single day, with no expectation of twice the index return over longer stretches. The index and multiple are named in the fund's own fact sheet.direxion.com

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.
  • TEXU The daily reset means compounding. Over several choppy days in energy, the result can land well away from twice the index move, in either direction.direxion.com
  • A 2025 launch that is still small and thinly traded next to the category's veterans, which can mean wider spreads at the moment you trade.
  • That 0.98% rides on a contractual waiver; the gross expense ratio is 8.25%, so the cost picture leans on the waiver currently set to run through September 1, 2027.

Full ROM profile⁠

Full TEXU profile⁠

ROM vs TEXU Holdings

How ROM and TEXU differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ROM and 0.0% of TEXU.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TEXU.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ROM and TEXU, widest gap first
CountryMore in ROMMore in TEXU
United StatesTEXU +0.6 points
Other countries (2)ROM +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ROM70.0%
  • TEXU97.9%

Securities held

  • ROM84
  • TEXU7

Asset class

ROM
Equity
TEXU
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ROM84
  • In both0
  • Only in TEXU7

Only in ROM

84 securities, 70.9% of ROM by weight

  • Apple Inc9.53%
  • NVIDIA Corp9.38%
  • Microsoft Corp7.34%

Only in TEXU

7 securities, 32.4% of TEXU by weight

  • Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5067.78%
  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp4.68%
  • Conocophillips4.61%

Weight gaps

ROM and TEXU share no securities.

All 80 ROM holdings⁠All TEXU holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs TEXU Cost

Overpaying TEXU vs ROM

$823

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • TEXU 0.98%

    $18,362

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • TEXU 0.98%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TEXU $18,362ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearROMTEXUOverpaying
10$1,644$1,729$85
20$6,199$6,504$305
30$17,539$18,362$823

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • 0.98%TEXU
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

TEXU 71st cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs TEXU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
TEXU No data
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
TEXU No data
Last payment
ROM $0.02
TEXU $0.26
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
TEXU Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
TEXU Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
TEXU Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
TEXUQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll TEXU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16; Mar 24, 2026 $0.14; Jun 23, 2026 $0.22; Sep 22, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

ROM vs TEXU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%TEXU 56.3%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97TEXU 1.58since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%TEXU −31.7%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09TEXU −1.43

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TEXUDvsQLDA

    Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TEXUDvsUYGA

    Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TEXUDvsDDMB

    Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.98% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.