ROM ranks 3rd and UBR 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UBR
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.93%0.95%
ROM 16.3×the volume
50.3K3.08K
ROM +44.3pt
+35.1%−9.2%
ROM vs UBR Performance
+88.3%+16.5%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UBR 0.95%
- ROM $962M
- UBR $2M
- ROM +23.8%, better
- UBR −9.0%
- ROM 0.03%
- UBR 2.38%, better
- ROM 86
- UBR 1
- ROM 50.3K sh, better
- UBR 3.08K sh
- ROM $110.30
- UBR $22.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UBR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C51 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | B57 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UBR are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UBRC
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UBR Two times the daily move of Brazil's large-cap index in one ticker, with index caps that keep Petrobras and Vale from swallowing the basket. Leverage resets every day. 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UBR UBR seeks daily results equal to two times the daily performance of the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UBR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UBR Cost
Overpaying UBR vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UBR 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UBR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,322 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $17,869 | $330 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.95%UBR
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UBR 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UBR Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UBR 2.38%, better
- ROM $0.04
- UBR $0.56
- ROM $0.02
- UBR $0.17
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UBR Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UBR Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UBR Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UBR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROM
- UBR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%, betterUBR 50.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97, betterUBR 0.21
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%UBR −65.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UBR 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.