ROM ranks 3rd and UBT 13th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UBT
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.93%0.95%
UBT 1.7×the volume
47.7K81.9K
ROM +45.3pt
+36.6%−8.7%
ROM vs UBT Performance
+126.1%−69.1%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UBT 0.95%
- ROM $1.15B
- UBT $68M
- ROM +26.5%, better
- UBT −14.5%
- ROM 0.03%
- UBT 3.27%, better
- ROM 85
- UBT 3
- ROM 47.7K sh
- UBT 81.9K sh, better
- ROM $132.18
- UBT $14.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C51 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | A73 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UBT are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UBTB
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UBT The leveraged bull aisle is wall-to-wall stock funds. UBT is the duration trade: 2x the daily move of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, and ProShares calls it the only ETF targeting that exact 2x.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UBT The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UBT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UBT Cost
Overpaying UBT vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UBT 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,322 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $17,869 | $330 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.95%UBT
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UBT 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UBT Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UBT 3.27%, better
- ROM $0.04
- UBT $0.48
- ROM $0.02
- UBT $0.11
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UBT Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UBT Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UBT Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROM
- UBT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%UBT 26.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97, betterUBT −0.02
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%, betterUBT −74.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UBT 4.79
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.