Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs UCC

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary

UCCCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.02pt a year

ROM0.93%UCC0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 17.9×the volume

ROM47.7KUCC2.66K

10Y return · a year

ROM +23.1pt

ROM+36.6%UCC+13.5%

ROM vs UCC Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+126.1%ROM−12.5%UCC

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. ROM +126.1%. UCC −12.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%50%200%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%, better
UCC 0.95%
Fund size
ROM $1.15B
UCC $9M
1Y total return
ROM +26.5%, better
UCC −14.9%
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
UCC 1.38%, better
Holdings
ROM 85
UCC 48
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 47.7K sh, better
UCC 2.66K sh
NAV per share
ROM $132.18
UCC $44.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings not scored, Durability 81. UCC: Cost 51, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 50, Durability 63.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, UCC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMUCC
Cost30% weightA70HigherC51
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherC44
Tradability15% weightA88HigherC51
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC50
Durability5% weightA81HigherB63

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and UCC are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and UCC 27th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 77
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 71
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 25CUGLProShares Ultra GoldScore 52
  6. Rank 27CUCCProShares Ultra Consumer DiscretionaryScore 50
  7. Rank 28CAGQProShares Ultra SilverScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

UCCCProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

UCC The original 2x bet on the American shopper: since 2007, UCC has aimed to deliver twice the daily move of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, spreading its leverage across a whole sector basket instead of one hot stock.

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

UCC UCC seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com
  • UCC Launched in 2007, one of the longest-running leveraged sector ETFs, with nearly two decades of trading through bull runs, crashes and rate shocks.proshares.com
  • Leverage rides a basket of about 60 discretionary names rather than a single stock, so no one earnings miss sets the whole position.proshares.com
  • Costs 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (gross 1.67%), near the category median and level with ProShares stablemate DDM at 0.95%.
  • One ticker in an ordinary brokerage account does the work: no margin loan, no swap desk, no rolling futures yourself.proshares.com

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.
  • UCC The 2x target resets every day. Hold longer and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can land well off twice the index move, especially in choppy markets.proshares.com
  • A small fund that sits among the thinner traders in its category, so spreads can widen; the price you see may not be the price you get at market.
  • That 0.95% is net of a waiver with a stated end date of September 30, 2027; the gross expense ratio behind it is 1.67%.

Full ROM profile⁠

Full UCC profile⁠

ROM vs UCC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs UCC Cost

Overpaying UCC vs ROM

$330

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • UCC 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • UCC 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530UCC $17,869ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearROMUCCOverpaying
10$1,644$1,678$34
20$6,199$6,322$123
30$17,539$17,869$330

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • 0.95%UCC
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

UCC 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs UCC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
UCC 1.38%, better
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
UCC $0.62
Last payment
ROM $0.02
UCC $0.20
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
UCC Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
UCC Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
UCC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
UCCQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll UCC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0043; Jun 21, 2017 $0.0069; Dec 26, 2017 $0.02; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0095; Jun 20, 2018 $0.003; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.0025; Jun 25, 2019 $0.02; Sep 25, 2019 $0.0068; Dec 24, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.0099; Dec 22, 2022 $0.06; Dec 20, 2023 $0.01; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.02; Sep 25, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.12; Sep 24, 2025 $0.18; Dec 24, 2025 $0.15; Mar 25, 2026 $0.11; Jun 24, 2026 $0.15; Sep 23, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

ROM vs UCC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • ROM
  • UCC
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: ROM −67.6% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%UCC 35.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97, betterUCC 0.57
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%UCC −61.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09UCC 2.23

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCCCvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCCCvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCCCvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.