ROM ranks 3rd and UPAL 75th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UPAL
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.93%0.95%
ROM 43.9×the volume
47.7K1.09K
ROM vs UPAL Performance
+2.0%−46.8%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UPAL 0.95%
- ROM $1.15B
- UPAL $0
- ROM +26.5%
- UPAL
- ROM 0.03%
- UPAL
- ROM 85
- UPAL 1
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- UPAL 1.09K sh
- ROM $132.18
- UPAL $12.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UPAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C51 |
| Mission | F21 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | D33 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UPAL are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UPALD
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UPAL The first ETF built to target 2x palladium's daily move, and it sends a 1099 instead of a K-1. Swap-based, resets every day, 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UPAL UPAL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the daily performance of palladium. Its objective is designed for a single day rather than a longer holding period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UPAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UPAL Cost
Overpaying UPAL vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UPAL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UPAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,322 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $17,869 | $330 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.95%UPAL
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UPAL 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UPAL Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UPAL
- ROM $0.04
- UPAL
- ROM $0.02
- UPAL $0.16
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UPAL Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UPAL Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UPAL Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UPAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%UPAL
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97UPAL
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%UPAL
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UPAL −1.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.