ROM ranks 3rd and UPW 20th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UPW
ROM −0.02pt a year
0.93%0.95%
ROM 2.4×the volume
47.7K19.6K
ROM +28.0pt
+36.6%+8.6%
ROM vs UPW Performance
+126.1%+39.5%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UPW 0.95%
- ROM $1.15B
- UPW $13M
- ROM +26.5%, better
- UPW −7.7%
- ROM 0.03%
- UPW 1.77%, better
- ROM 85
- UPW 32
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- UPW 19.6K sh
- ROM $132.18
- UPW $21.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UPW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C51 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | B69 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B65 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UPW are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UPWB
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UPW Utilities are the market's sleepy defensive corner. UPW is the only ETF that bolts 2x daily leverage onto them, and it has been running that trade since 2007.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UPW The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily performance of the S&P Utilities Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UPW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UPW Cost
Overpaying UPW vs ROM
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UPW 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UPW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,678 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $6,322 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $17,869 | $330 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 0.95%UPW
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UPW 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UPW Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UPW 1.77%, better
- ROM $0.04
- UPW $0.38
- ROM $0.02
- UPW $0.13
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UPW Sep 23, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UPW Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UPW Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UPW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROM
- UPW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%UPW 32.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97, betterUPW 0.69
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%UPW −50.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UPW 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.