ROM ranks 3rd and URAA 92nd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs URAA
ROM −0.37pt a year
0.93%1.30%
URAA 1.4×the volume
47.7K64.7K
ROM vs URAA Performance
+26.5%−69.9%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- URAA 1.30%
- ROM $1.15B
- URAA $25M
- ROM +26.5%, better
- URAA −69.9%
- ROM 0.03%
- URAA 21.94%, better
- ROM 85
- URAA 12
- ROM 47.7K sh
- URAA 64.7K sh, better
- ROM $132.18
- URAA $15.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | URAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F9 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B56 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and URAA are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
URAAF
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
URAA A 2x daily play on uranium and nuclear built on an index of other uranium ETFs, so one ticker reaches dozens of miners and reactor names. Fee is 1.30%, net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
URAA The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the performance of the Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs URAA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs URAA Cost
Overpaying URAA vs ROM
$5,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
URAA 1.30%
$23,369
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | URAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $2,263 | $619 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $8,393 | $2,194 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $23,369 | $5,830 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 1.30%URAA
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
URAA 90th cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs URAA Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- URAA 21.94%, better
- ROM $0.04
- URAA $3.13
- ROM $0.02
- URAA $0.04
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- URAA Sep 22, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- URAA Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- URAA Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs URAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%URAA 89.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97URAA 0.15
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%URAA −76.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09URAA 4.28
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.