Skip to content
etf.net

ROM vs URE

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROMANYSE Arca

ProShares Ultra Real Estate

UREBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ROM −0.02pt a year

ROM0.93%URE0.95%

Avg volume · 30D

ROM 16.5×the volume

ROM50.3KURE3.06K

10Y return · a year

ROM +30.7pt

ROM+35.1%URE+4.4%

ROM vs URE Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+88.3%ROM−26.3%URE

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. ROM +88.3%. URE −26.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%150%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ROM 0.93%, better
URE 0.95%
Fund size
ROM $962M
URE $53M
1Y total return
ROM +23.8%, better
URE +16.4%
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
URE 1.87%, better
Holdings
ROM 86
URE 32
Avg volume (30D)
ROM 50.3K sh, better
URE 3.06K sh
NAV per share
ROM $110.30
URE $67.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ROM: Cost 70, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 88, Holdings 52, Durability 80. URE: Cost 51, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 66, Durability 71.
Pillar letters and Scores for ROM, URE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarROMURE
Cost30% weightA70HigherC51
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49B67Higher
Tradability15% weightA88HigherB62
Holdings10% weightC52B66Higher
Durability5% weightA80HigherA71

Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ROM and URE are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Leveraged Long (2x & Other)⁠

Category · 95 funds
See all 95 ›

ROM ranks 3rd and URE 14th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLDProShares Ultra QQQScore 76
  2. Rank 2AUYGProShares Ultra FinancialsScore 74
  3. Rank 3AROMProShares Ultra TechnologyScore 70
  4. Rank 4BDDMProShares Ultra Dow30Score 69
  5. Rank 14BUBTProShares Ultra 20+ Year TreasuryScore 58
  6. Rank 14BUREProShares Ultra Real EstateScore 58
  7. Rank 16BUXIProShares Ultra IndustrialsScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ROMAProShares Ultra Technology

UREBProShares Ultra Real Estate

In short

ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.

URE A 2x dial on the real estate slice of the S&P 500: about 40 landlords, towers and warehouses, geared up and reset every single day. Listed January 2007, same mandate ever since.

Stated mandate

ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.

URE The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P Real Estate Select Sector SM Index.

Why people hold it

  • ROM Two times, not three. A 2x daily target means smaller swings and less compounding drag than a 3x fund chasing the same sector.sec.gov
  • Live since January 2007, so it has run through the 2008 crash and the full tech cycle since. Long mileage is rare in geared funds.
  • 0.93% a year, flat, with no waiver propping it up. Peer QLD runs 0.89%, but only net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
  • One of the strongest implementations in the leveraged-bull pack, from an issuer that has run geared funds since the category's early days.proshares.com
  • URE Listed in January 2007, URE has run the same 2x real estate mandate through the housing bust and everything after, a long life for a geared sector fund.proshares.com
  • The reference index holds the real estate companies inside the S&P 500, about 40 large names, and URE targets twice that index's daily move.cboe.com
  • 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027, near the category median: level with DDM at 0.95%, just above QLD at 0.89% (net of a waiver through September 30, 2027).
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded leveraged bull field: a plain large-cap sector index, a clear 2x mandate and a shop that has kept the lights on since 2007.

Worth knowing

  • ROM The 2x target resets at each close, so results over weeks or months depend on the path the sector takes, not just where it ends up.sec.govproshares.com
  • Trades thinner than the category's headline names, so spreads and limit orders matter, especially in size.
  • About 80 tech names from the S&P 500. That is one concentrated sector bet, doubled, in both directions.
  • URE The 2x target applies to one day. Hold longer and each day compounds on the last, so multi-day results can land above or below twice the index move, especially in choppy tape.proshares.com
  • Thinly traded next to the headline geared funds, with a smaller asset base, so spreads can widen and larger orders need more care.
  • The 0.95% rate leans on a waiver running through September 30, 2027; gross expenses are 1.12% without it.

Full ROM profile⁠

Full URE profile⁠

ROM vs URE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ROM vs URE Cost

Overpaying URE vs ROM

$330

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ROM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • URE 0.95%

    $17,869

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ROM 0.93%
  • URE 0.95%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530URE $17,869ROM $17,539

Year by year

YearROMUREOverpaying
10$1,644$1,678$34
20$6,199$6,322$123
30$17,539$17,869$330

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ROM, cheaper
  • 0.95%URE
  • Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
  • Median 0.95%

ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds

URE 32nd cheapest of 95 funds

ROM vs URE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ROM 0.03%
URE 1.87%, better
Payout (12M)
ROM $0.04
URE $1.31
Last payment
ROM $0.02
URE $0.24
Ex-dividend
ROM Mar 25, 2026
URE Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
ROM Mar 31, 2026
URE Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
ROM Quarterly
URE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ROMQuarterly · 19 paymentsAll ROM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.0015; Dec 26, 2017 $0.0075; Mar 21, 2018 $0.0064; Jun 20, 2018 $0.006; Dec 26, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.0043; Dec 24, 2019 $0.01; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0042; Mar 20, 2024 $0.01; Jun 26, 2024 $0.04; Sep 25, 2024 $0.06; Dec 23, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.02; Jun 25, 2025 $0.14; Sep 24, 2025 $0.05; Dec 24, 2025 $0.02; Mar 25, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
UREQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll URE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 21, 2017 $0.11; Sep 27, 2017 $0.06; Dec 26, 2017 $0.44; Mar 21, 2018 $0.01; Jun 20, 2018 $0.17; Sep 26, 2018 $0.25; Dec 26, 2018 $0.44; Mar 20, 2019 $0.01; Jun 25, 2019 $0.36; Sep 25, 2019 $0.15; Dec 24, 2019 $0.44; Mar 25, 2020 $0.14; Jun 24, 2020 $0.07; Sep 23, 2020 $0.08; Dec 23, 2020 $0.30; Jun 22, 2021 $0.08; Sep 22, 2021 $0.14; Dec 23, 2021 $0.46; Jun 22, 2022 $0.03; Sep 21, 2022 $0.31; Dec 22, 2022 $0.38; Jun 21, 2023 $0.12; Sep 20, 2023 $0.26; Dec 20, 2023 $0.46; Mar 20, 2024 $0.04; Jun 26, 2024 $0.53; Sep 25, 2024 $0.32; Dec 23, 2024 $0.42; Mar 26, 2025 $0.26; Jun 25, 2025 $0.29; Sep 24, 2025 $0.36; Dec 24, 2025 $0.51; Mar 25, 2026 $0.21; Jun 24, 2026 $0.34; Sep 23, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

ROM vs URE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • ROM
  • URE
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: ROM −67.6% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ROM 49.3%URE 33.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ROM 0.97, betterURE 0.49
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ROM −67.6%URE −63.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ROM 3.09URE 1.88

Popular comparisons

  • ROMAvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UREBvsQLDA

    ProShares Ultra Real Estate · ProShares Ultra QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UREBvsUYGA

    ProShares Ultra Real Estate · ProShares Ultra Financials

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.93%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ROMAvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Technology · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UREBvsDDMB

    ProShares Ultra Real Estate · ProShares Ultra Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.95% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.