ROM ranks 3rd and XCOM 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs XCOM
XCOM −0.48pt a year
0.93%0.45%
ROM 128.8×the volume
47.7K370
ROM vs XCOM Performance
+2.0%+23.8%
- ROM 0.93%
- XCOM 0.45%, better
- ROM $1.15B
- XCOM $1M
- ROM +26.5%
- XCOM
- ROM 0.03%
- XCOM
- ROM 85
- XCOM 1
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- XCOM 370 sh
- ROM $132.18
- XCOM $28.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | XCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | F23 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and XCOM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
XCOMC
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
XCOM Geared commodity exposure in a category dominated by leveraged stock-index trades: XCOM aims for about two times the daily move of a commodity basket, at 0.45% a year, well under the typical leveraged-ETF fee.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
XCOM The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to approximately two times the daily performance of its commodity-related underlying exposure. The trust describes this as a single-day objective pursued through leveraged instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs XCOM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs XCOM Cost
Overpaying ROM vs XCOM
$8,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
XCOM 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | XCOM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $812 | $832 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $3,128 | $3,071 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $9,041 | $8,498 |
- 0.93%ROM
- 0.45%XCOM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
XCOM 3rd cheapest of 95 funds
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs XCOM Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- XCOM
- ROM $0.04
- XCOM None
- ROM $0.02
- XCOM
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- XCOM
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- XCOM
- ROM Quarterly
- XCOM
Distribution history
ROM vs XCOM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%XCOM
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97XCOM
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%XCOM
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09XCOM −0.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.