XLY ranks 1st and RTH 5th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
RTH vs XLY
XLY −0.27pt a year
0.35%0.08%
XLY 1618.0×the volume
4.34K7.02M
RTH +2.2pt
+14.8%+12.6%
RTH vs XLY Performance
+51.0%+19.6%
- RTH 0.35%
- XLY 0.08%, better
- RTH $247M
- XLY $22.5B
- RTH +8.3%, better
- XLY −3.0%
- RTH 0.90%, better
- XLY 0.81%
- RTH 27
- XLY 50
- RTH 4.34K sh
- XLY 7.02M sh, better
- RTH $268.56
- XLY $116.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RTH | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A96Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | C46 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | D39Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A79Higher |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. RTH and XLY are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RTHB
XLYA
In short
RTH Retail, undiluted. RTH owns roughly 25 of the largest, most liquid US-listed retailers, each required to earn at least half its revenue from selling goods. No car makers or burger chains riding along under the consumer label.
XLY Live since 1998 as one of the original Select Sector SPDRs, XLY bundles the S&P 500's spending-money stocks (cars, couches, burgers, online carts) into one heavily traded ticker at eight basis points.
Stated mandate
RTH The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index through a passive indexing approach.
XLY The fund seeks to track the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, providing targeted exposure to companies in the consumer discretionary sector.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RTH vs XLY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RTH vs XLY Cost
Overpaying RTH vs XLY
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RTH 0.35%
$7,126
XLY 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RTH | XLY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $147 | $487 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $575 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,689 | $5,437 |
- 0.35%RTH
- 0.08%XLY, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
XLY cheapest of 14 funds
RTH 6th cheapest of 14 funds
RTH vs XLY Dividends
- RTH 0.90%, better
- XLY 0.81%
- RTH $2.42
- XLY $0.93
- RTH $2.42
- XLY $0.24
- RTH Dec 22, 2025
- XLY Sep 21, 2026
- RTH Dec 26, 2025
- XLY Sep 23, 2026
- RTH Annual
- XLY Quarterly
Distribution history
RTH vs XLY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RTH
- XLY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RTH 13.8%, betterXLY 17.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- RTH 0.96, betterXLY 0.67
- Worst fall
- RTH −25.0%, betterXLY −39.7%
- Market sensitivity
- RTH 0.85XLY 1.22
RTH and XLY in the news


Closing Bell
Stocks higher on narrow tech and consumer rally




Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.