FDIS ranks 2nd and RTH 5th of 14 funds in the Consumer Discretionary (Broad) Category.
FDIS vs RTH
FDIS −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
FDIS 25.1×the volume
109K4.34K
RTH +1.2pt
+13.6%+14.8%
FDIS vs RTH Performance
+19.1%+51.0%
- FDIS 0.08%, better
- RTH 0.35%
- FDIS $1.63B
- RTH $247M
- FDIS −1.7%
- RTH +8.3%, better
- FDIS 0.77%
- RTH 0.90%, better
- FDIS 242
- RTH 27
- FDIS 109K sh, better
- RTH 4.34K sh
- FDIS $100.14
- RTH $268.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDIS | RTH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | A96Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C51Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B58Higher | C50 |
Rank among Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
Same Category. FDIS and RTH are both graded against the same 14 Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDISB
RTHB
In short
FDIS Cheap and wide. FDIS holds about 300 US consumer discretionary stocks rather than the sector's mega-cap handful, and charges 0.08% while the typical fund in its peer group asks roughly four times that.
RTH Retail, undiluted. RTH owns roughly 25 of the largest, most liquid US-listed retailers, each required to earn at least half its revenue from selling goods. No car makers or burger chains riding along under the consumer label.
Stated mandate
FDIS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index.
RTH The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index through a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDIS vs RTH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDIS vs RTH Cost
Overpaying RTH vs FDIS
$5,353
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDIS 0.084%
$1,773
RTH 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDIS | RTH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $634 | $480 |
| 20 | $603 | $2,454 | $1,851 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $7,126 | $5,353 |
- 0.08%FDIS, cheaper
- 0.35%RTH
- Middle half of Consumer Discretionary (Broad) funds
- Median 0.35%
FDIS 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
RTH 6th cheapest of 14 funds
FDIS vs RTH Dividends
- FDIS 0.77%
- RTH 0.90%, better
- FDIS $0.78
- RTH $2.42
- FDIS $0.20
- RTH $2.42
- FDIS Sep 18, 2026
- RTH Dec 22, 2025
- FDIS Sep 22, 2026
- RTH Dec 26, 2025
- FDIS Quarterly
- RTH Annual
Distribution history
FDIS vs RTH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDIS
- RTH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDIS 18.2%RTH 13.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDIS 0.65RTH 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- FDIS −39.2%RTH −25.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDIS 1.26RTH 0.85
FDIS and RTH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

