SLVP ranks 3rd and SIL 11th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
SIL vs SLVP
SLVP −0.26pt a year
0.65%0.39%
SIL 4.1×the volume
1.04M253K
SLVP +2.8pt
+7.3%+10.1%
SIL vs SLVP Performance
+94.7%+123.1%
- SIL 0.65%
- SLVP 0.39%, better
- SIL $3.68B
- SLVP $730M
- SIL +8.3%
- SLVP +11.4%, better
- SIL 1.43%
- SLVP 2.43%, better
- SIL 41
- SLVP 47
- SIL 1.04M sh, better
- SLVP 253K sh
- SIL $71.20
- SLVP $28.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIL | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A79Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A75 |
| Holdings | D32Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A83Higher | A79 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. SIL and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SILC
SLVPB
In short
SIL The original US silver-miner ETF, listed since 2010 and still the big, liquid name in a small aisle: about 40 global companies that mine, refine and explore for silver, rather than the metal in a vault.
SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.
Stated mandate
SIL The fund seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index before fees and expenses, focusing on companies economically tied to silver mining.
SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIL vs SLVP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIL vs SLVP Cost
Overpaying SIL vs SLVP
$4,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIL 0.65%
$12,717
SLVP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIL | SLVP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $705 | $458 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,725 | $1,715 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $7,898 | $4,819 |
- 0.65%SIL
- 0.39%SLVP, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds
SIL 12th cheapest of 18 funds
SIL vs SLVP Dividends
- SIL 1.43%
- SLVP 2.43%, better
- SIL $1.02
- SLVP $0.70
- SIL $0.11
- SLVP $0.14
- SIL Jun 29, 2026
- SLVP Jun 15, 2026
- SIL Jul 7, 2026
- SLVP Jun 18, 2026
- SIL Twice a year
- SLVP Twice a year
Distribution history
SIL vs SLVP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SIL
- SLVP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIL 46.1%, betterSLVP 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- SIL 0.95SLVP 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- SIL −47.9%SLVP −47.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SIL 1.06SLVP 1.21
SIL and SLVP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

