Skip to content
etf.net

SIVR vs YSAG

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

SIVRANYSE Arca

Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF

YSAGCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIVR −0.09pt a year

SIVR0.30%YSAG0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

SIVR 1052.1×the volume

SIVR1.47MYSAG1.4K

SIVR vs YSAG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−14.8%SIVR−14.5%YSAG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. SIVR −14.8%. YSAG −14.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SIVR 0.30%, better
YSAG 0.39%
Fund size
SIVR $3.45B
YSAG $3M
1Y total return
SIVR +1.5%
YSAG No data
Holdings
SIVR 1
YSAG 2
Avg volume (30D)
SIVR 1.47M sh, better
YSAG 1.4K sh
NAV per share
SIVR $47.57
YSAG $50.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SIVR: Cost 92, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 52, Holdings not scored, Durability 73. YSAG: Cost 82, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings not scored, Durability 23.
Pillar letters and Scores for SIVR, YSAG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSIVRYSAG
Cost30% weightA92HigherA82
Mission25% weightA89Not scored
Risk15% weightD37C49Higher
Tradability15% weightC52HigherF16
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA73HigherF23

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SIVR and YSAG are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SIVR ranks 1st and YSAG 7th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 6CPALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 8DUXRoundhill Uranium ETFScore 34
  6. CTWONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SIVRAabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

YSAGCTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF

In short

SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.

YSAG No data

Stated mandate

SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.

YSAG No data

Why people hold it

  • SIVR 0.30% a year, versus a 0.60% median across physical metal funds and 0.50% at the biggest silver trust, SLV. When the mandate is just holding metal, cost is the differentiator.
  • The mandate is one sentence: track the price of physical silver after expenses. Real metal, not futures contracts, swaps, or miner stocks standing in for the metal.
  • A multi-billion-dollar trust that trades actively, so entering and exiting is usually a routine order rather than a hunt for the other side.
  • Running since 2009 and rated among the strongest implementations in the physical commodity group, on both cost and how closely it delivers its stated mandate.

YSAG No data

Worth knowing

  • SIVR One metal, one price. Silver moves hard in both directions and there is no diversification inside the trust to soften it.
  • Bullion generates no cash flow, so this is a price-only holding rather than an income one.
  • It is a commodity trust, not a registered 1940 Act fund, so the legal protections and tax treatment differ from a standard stock or bond ETF.

YSAG No data

Full SIVR profile⁠

Full YSAG profile⁠

SIVR vs YSAG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SIVR vs YSAG Cost

Overpaying YSAG vs SIVR

$1,749

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SIVR 0.30%

    $6,149

  • YSAG 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SIVR 0.30%
  • YSAG 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530YSAG $7,898SIVR $6,149

Year by year

YearSIVRYSAGOverpaying
10$545$705$160
20$2,113$2,725$612
30$6,149$7,898$1,749

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
  • 0.39%YSAG
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

SIVR cheapest of 9 funds

YSAG 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

SIVR vs YSAG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SIVR None
YSAG None

Distribution history

SIVRAll SIVR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

YSAGAll YSAG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIVR vs YSAG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SIVR 37.0%YSAG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SIVR 0.75YSAG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SIVR −57.7%YSAG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SIVR 1.26YSAG 0.00

SIVR and YSAG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • SIVRAvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • YSAGCvsSLVB

    Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SIVRAvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • YSAGCvsPLTMB

    Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SIVRAvsGLTRB

    abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • YSAGCvsGLTRB

    Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.