Skip to content

SLV vs YSAG

iShares Silver Trust

SLVBNYSE Arca

Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF

YSAGCNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

YSAG −0.11pt a year

SLV0.50%YSAG0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

SLV 11667.3×the volume

SLV16.3MYSAG1.4K

SLV vs YSAG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−14.8%SLV−14.5%YSAG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. SLV −14.8%. YSAG −14.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SLV 0.50%
YSAG 0.39%, better
Fund size
SLV $25.2B
YSAG $3M
1Y total return
SLV +1.3%
YSAG No data
Holdings
SLV 1
YSAG 2
Avg volume (30D)
SLV 16.3M sh, better
YSAG 1.4K sh
NAV per share
SLV $45.22
YSAG $50.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SLV: Cost 67, Risk 37, Mission 89, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 84. YSAG: Cost 82, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings not scored, Durability 23.
Pillar letters and Scores for SLV, YSAG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSLVYSAG
Cost30% weightB67A82Higher
Mission25% weightA89Not scored
Risk15% weightD37C49Higher
Tradability15% weightA71HigherF16
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA84HigherF23

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SLV and YSAG are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SLV ranks 2nd and YSAG 7th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 6CPALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 7CYSAGTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 8DUXRoundhill Uranium ETFScore 34
  7. CTWONot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SLVBiShares Silver Trust

YSAGCTexas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF

In short

SLV Silver, unbundled: real bars sitting with a custodian, a share price that shadows the LBMA Silver Price less a 0.50% fee. Trading since 2006 and one of the busiest commodity funds on the tape, it's the default way people put silver in a brokerage account.

YSAG No data

Stated mandate

SLV The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of silver prices before its expenses and liabilities. Its assets consist primarily of silver held by a custodian.

YSAG No data

Why people hold it

  • SLV The deep end of the silver pool: running since 2006, a multi-billion-dollar trust, and very actively traded, which is what keeps spreads tight and the options market busy.
  • Metal, not machinery. Assets are physical silver held by a custodian and priced off the LBMA Silver Price. No futures roll, no miner earnings, no swap counterparty.sec.gov
  • 0.50% a year, under the typical physical-metal trust, and the design is about as plain as it gets: bullion price minus expenses, tracked closely.

YSAG No data

Worth knowing

  • SLV SIVR runs the same physical-silver idea for 0.30%. The extra fee here buys size and trading depth, not different metal.
  • No income. Bullion pays nothing, and the trustee sells silver to cover expenses, so the metal behind each share slowly shrinks.sec.gov
  • One metal, one price. Nothing inside the trust cushions a silver drawdown, and silver is a jumpy market by nature.

YSAG No data

Full SLV profile⁠

Full YSAG profile⁠

SLV vs YSAG Holdings

How SLV and YSAG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SLV and 0.0% of YSAG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for SLV and YSAG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for SLV and YSAG.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SLV100.0%
  • YSAG100.0%

Securities held

  • SLV1
  • YSAG2

Asset class

SLV
Commodities
YSAG
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in SLV1
  • In both0
  • Only in YSAG2

Only in SLV

1 security, 100% of SLV by weight

  • Physical Silver100.00%

Only in YSAG

2 securities, 100% of YSAG by weight

  • Silver (Physical)98.65%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20371.39%

Weight gaps

SLV and YSAG share no securities.

All SLV holdings⁠All 2 YSAG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SLV vs YSAG Cost

Overpaying SLV vs YSAG

$2,081

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SLV 0.50%

    $9,979

  • YSAG 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SLV 0.50%
  • YSAG 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SLV $9,979YSAG $7,898

Year by year

YearSLVYSAGOverpaying
10$900$705$195
20$3,460$2,725$735
30$9,979$7,898$2,081

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%SLV
  • 0.39%YSAG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

YSAG 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

SLV 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

SLV vs YSAG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SLV None
YSAG None

Distribution history

SLVAll SLV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

YSAGAll YSAG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SLV vs YSAG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SLV 37.0%YSAG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SLV 0.75YSAG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SLV −57.8%YSAG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SLV 1.26YSAG 0.00

SLV and YSAG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SLVBvsSIVRA

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YSAGCvsSIVRA

    Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsPLTMB

    iShares Silver Trust · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YSAGCvsPLTMB

    Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVBvsGLTRB

    iShares Silver Trust · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YSAGCvsGLTRB

    Texas Precious Metals Trust Y'all Street Physical Silver ETF · abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.