VIG ranks 4th and SMDV 36th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
SMDV vs VIG
VIG −0.36pt a year
0.40%0.04%
VIG 9.5×the volume
108K1.02M
VIG +6.3pt
+7.6%+13.9%
SMDV vs VIG Performance
+32.8%+64.7%
- SMDV 0.40%
- VIG 0.04%, better
- SMDV $668M
- VIG $128B
- SMDV +19.6%, better
- VIG +16.2%
- SMDV 2.30%, better
- VIG 1.47%
- SMDV 71
- VIG 343
- SMDV 108K sh
- VIG 1.02M sh, better
- SMDV $74.31
- VIG $247.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMDV | VIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A84Higher |
| Risk | F13 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B62 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. SMDV and VIG are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMDVC
VIGA
In short
SMDV Dividend-growth screens usually live in large-cap land. SMDV points one at the small-cap Russell 2000 instead, holding about 100 names selected for their dividend growth records, and it has run that way since 2015.
VIG VIG buys dividend growth, not fat yields: about 300 US companies with a record of raising their payouts, tracked for 0.04% a year. Running since 2006 and now north of $100 billion, it is the plain-vanilla anchor of the dividend-screen aisle.
Stated mandate
SMDV SMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index.
VIG The fund seeks to track the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which represents common stocks of companies with a record of increasing dividends over time.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMDV vs VIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMDV vs VIG Cost
Overpaying SMDV vs VIG
$7,241
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMDV 0.40%
$8,090
VIG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMDV | VIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $73 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $288 | $2,505 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $849 | $7,241 |
- 0.40%SMDV
- 0.04%VIG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
VIG cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV 37th cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV vs VIG Dividends
- SMDV 2.30%, better
- VIG 1.47%
- SMDV $1.75
- VIG $3.65
- SMDV $0.42
- VIG $0.93
- SMDV Sep 23, 2026
- VIG Sep 28, 2026
- SMDV Sep 29, 2026
- VIG Sep 30, 2026
- SMDV Quarterly
- VIG Quarterly
Distribution history
SMDV vs VIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SMDV
- VIG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMDV 17.6%VIG 10.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMDV 0.58VIG 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- SMDV −21.2%VIG −20.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SMDV 0.79VIG 0.82
SMDV and VIG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





