TRFM ranks 3rd and SOCL 21st of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
SOCL vs TRFM
TRFM −0.16pt a year
0.65%0.49%
TRFM 4.2×the volume
9.54K40.1K
SOCL vs TRFM Performance
−31.2%+5.8%
- SOCL 0.65%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- SOCL $75M
- TRFM $313M
- SOCL −31.2%
- TRFM +5.8%, better
- SOCL 0.54%
- TRFM
- SOCL 49
- TRFM 266
- SOCL 9.54K sh
- TRFM 40.1K sh, better
- SOCL $39.61
- TRFM $53.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOCL | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F22 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D33 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A70Higher | C50 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. SOCL and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOCLC
TRFMA
In short
SOCL Social media as one ticker: about 50 platform companies worldwide, tracked to a Solactive index. Running since 2011, which makes it a veteran of the thematic shelf.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
SOCL The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Social Media Total Return Index, before fees and expenses.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOCL vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOCL vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying SOCL vs TRFM
$2,925
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOCL 0.65%
$12,717
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOCL | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $883 | $280 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $3,394 | $1,046 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $9,792 | $2,925 |
- 0.65%SOCL
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
SOCL 12th cheapest of 30 funds
SOCL vs TRFM Dividends
- SOCL 0.54%
- TRFM
- SOCL $0.22
- TRFM
- SOCL $0.09
- TRFM $0.08
- SOCL Jun 29, 2026
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- SOCL Jul 7, 2026
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- SOCL Twice a year
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
SOCL vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOCL 21.5%, betterTRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SOCL 0.12TRFM 1.02, better
- Worst fall
- SOCL −61.1%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- SOCL 1.21TRFM 1.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.