Skip to content

SOCL vs XITK

Global X Social Media ETF

SOCLCNasdaq

State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITKANYSE Arca

Overlap

5.4%by weight

Expense ratio

XITK −0.20pt a year

SOCL0.65%XITK0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

SOCL 4.4×the volume

SOCL9.54KXITK2.15K

10Y return · a year

XITK +7.1pt

SOCL+5.8%XITK+12.9%

SOCL vs XITK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−33.8%SOCL−17.4%XITK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. SOCL −33.8%. XITK −17.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−50%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SOCL 0.65%
XITK 0.45%, better
Fund size
SOCL $75M
XITK $67M
1Y total return
SOCL −31.2%
XITK +0.6%, better
Yield (12M)
SOCL 0.54%, better
XITK 0.00%
Holdings
SOCL 49
XITK 95
Avg volume (30D)
SOCL 9.54K sh, better
XITK 2.15K sh
NAV per share
SOCL $39.61
XITK $197.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SOCL: Cost 53, Risk 22, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 33, Durability 70. XITK: Cost 95, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 81, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for SOCL, XITK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSOCLXITK
Cost30% weightC53A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF22D37Higher
Tradability15% weightD29B65Higher
Holdings10% weightD33A81Higher
Durability5% weightA70A73Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SOCL and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XITK ranks 4th and SOCL 21st of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5AGINNGoldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETFScore 70
  6. Rank 19CKNOAXS Knowledge Leaders ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 21CSOCLGlobal X Social Media ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 21CTEKXState Street Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SOCLCGlobal X Social Media ETF

XITKAState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

In short

SOCL Social media as one ticker: about 50 platform companies worldwide, tracked to a Solactive index. Running since 2011, which makes it a veteran of the thematic shelf.

XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.

Stated mandate

SOCL The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Social Media Total Return Index, before fees and expenses.

XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.

Why people hold it

  • SOCL Pure play, not a sprinkle. The index targets social and communications platforms directly, roughly 50 of them, rather than burying a few inside a broad tech basket.globalxetfs.com
  • Global mandate, so the basket reaches past US names to platforms listed abroad, where much of the world's scrolling actually happens.globalxetfs.com
  • The 0.65% fee sits right at the median for its innovation-theme peer group. Narrow focus, no novelty surcharge.
  • Live since 2011 and rules-based: the fund follows the Solactive Social Media index through platform cycles instead of a manager's hunch about the next feed.
  • XITK Costs 0.45% a year, comfortably under the 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds, and it does it inside a plain index wrapper from a major ETF shop.
  • Equal weighting at each reset gives the hundredth holding the same slot as the first, so results lean on the whole basket rather than two or three mega-caps.factset.com
  • Screens segments, not slogans: only companies drawing most of their revenue from the fastest-growing corners of tech and electronic media make the cut.factset.comssga.com
  • Trading since 2016, giving it a live record across several tech cycles, and it sits in the upper tier of our innovation-fund cohort review.

Worth knowing

  • SOCL Thinly traded and modest in size, so spreads can widen. Limit orders matter more here than in a mega-cap fund.
  • About 50 stocks in one theme means ad-market swings and single-company headlines land harder than they would in a broad index.
  • Broader innovation peers charge less for wider nets: KOMP at 0.20% and XT at 0.46%. The tight focus is the thing you're paying up for.
  • XITK Growth-screened tech, equal-weighted, means smaller names carry a giant's weight. Expect a rougher ride than a cap-weighted tech fund.
  • Thinly traded for its category and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the household-name tech ETFs.
  • Cheaper shelfmates exist: KOMP runs a broad new-economy basket for 0.20%.

Full SOCL profile⁠

Full XITK profile⁠

SOCL vs XITK Holdings

As of

How SOCL and XITK differ

Overlap by weight

5.4%

Shared holdings make up 41.4% of SOCL and 6.8% of XITK.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both5.4%
  • Sector8 Sectors13.6%
  • Countryby domicile53.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in SOCL and XITK, widest gap first
SectorMore in SOCLMore in XITK
CommunicationSOCL +85.7 points
TechnologyXITK +78.9 points
Health CareXITK +4.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXITK +1.1 points
IndustrialsXITK +0.9 points
FinancialsXITK +0.9 points
Consumer StaplesSOCL +0.7 points
Real EstateXITK +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in SOCL and XITK, widest gap first
CountryMore in SOCLMore in XITK
United StatesXITK +45.0 points
ChinaSOCL +25.8 points
South KoreaSOCL +12.9 points
JapanSOCL +5.0 points
SingaporeSOCL +1.1 points
GermanySOCL +1.1 points
TaiwanXITK +0.8 points
IsraelXITK +0.6 points
United KingdomSOCL +0.5 points

Outside the US: SOCL 15% developed, 85% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SOCL69.9%
  • XITK22.1%

Securities held

  • SOCL49
  • XITK94

Asset class

SOCL
Equity
XITK
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in SOCL41
  • In both8
  • Only in XITK86

Only in SOCL

41 securities, 58.6% of SOCL by weight

  • Tencent Holdings Ltd8.89%
  • Naver Corp8.82%
  • Netease Inc-Adr5.44%

Only in XITK

86 securities, 93.1% of XITK by weight

  • Axt Inc4.00%
  • Advanced Micro Devices2.62%
  • Silicon Motion Technol Adr2.53%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in SOCL and XITK, widest gap first
HoldingMore in SOCLMore in XITK
Meta Platforms IncMETASOCL +10.92 points
Reddit Inc-Cl ARDDTSOCL +9.27 points
Pinterest Inc- Class APINSSOCL +4.66 points
Alphabet Inc-Cl AGOOGLSOCL +4.50 points
Spotify Technology SASPOTSOCL +4.19 points
Snap Inc - ASNAPSOCL +2.50 points
Sprout Social Inc - Class ASPTXITK +0.82 points
Nextdoor Holdings IncNXDRXITK +0.67 points

All 50 SOCL holdings⁠All 94 XITK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SOCL vs XITK Cost

Overpaying SOCL vs XITK

$3,676

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SOCL 0.65%

    $12,717

  • XITK 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SOCL 0.65%
  • XITK 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SOCL $12,717XITK $9,041

Year by year

YearSOCLXITKOverpaying
10$1,163$812$351
20$4,440$3,128$1,312
30$12,717$9,041$3,676

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%SOCL
  • 0.45%XITK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

SOCL 12th cheapest of 30 funds

SOCL vs XITK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SOCL 0.54%, better
XITK 0.00%
Payout (12M)
SOCL $0.22
XITK None
Last payment
SOCL $0.09
XITK No data
Ex-dividend
SOCL Jun 29, 2026
XITK No data
Paid on
SOCL Jul 7, 2026
XITK No data
Frequency
SOCL Twice a year
XITK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

SOCLTwice a year · 8 paymentsAll SOCL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.12; Jun 29, 2023 $0.19; Dec 28, 2023 $0.05; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Jun 29, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XITK9 paymentsAll XITK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2017 $1.36; Dec 24, 2018 $1.24; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.0071; Sep 18, 2023 $0.0094; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

SOCL vs XITK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SOCL
  • XITK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: SOCL −61.1% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SOCL 21.5%, betterXITK 25.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SOCL 0.12XITK 0.63, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SOCL −61.1%, betterXITK −61.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SOCL 1.21XITK 1.67

Popular comparisons

  • SOCLCvsXTA

    Global X Social Media ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XITKAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOCLCvsKOMPA

    Global X Social Media ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XITKAvsKOMPA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOCLCvsTRFMA

    Global X Social Media ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XITKAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.