SOXL ranks 4th and TNA 20th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
SOXL vs TNA
SOXL −0.30pt a year
0.75%1.05%
SOXL 16.4×the volume
70.7M4.32M
SOXL +33.6pt
+39.4%+5.8%
SOXL vs TNA Performance
+66.7%−35.5%
- SOXL 0.75%, better
- TNA 1.05%
- SOXL $24.3B
- TNA $1.4B
- SOXL +61.4%, better
- TNA +24.0%
- SOXL 0.12%
- TNA 0.31%, better
- SOXL 43
- TNA 12
- SOXL 70.7M sh, better
- TNA 4.32M sh
- SOXL $102.45
- TNA $60.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOXL | TNA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | A79Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69Higher | B63 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. SOXL and TNA are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOXLA
TNAC
In short
SOXL A 3x bet on chip stocks that resets every single day. Direxion launched it in 2010, long before AI made semiconductors the market's main event, and it is now one of the most heavily traded leveraged funds out there.
TNA Three times the Russell 2000's daily move, run by the same fund since November 2008. In a category full of sector bets, this one is a straight leveraged play on US small caps.
Stated mandate
SOXL It is designed to deliver a daily result three times the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Index, before fees and expenses, with the objective applying for a single day.
TNA The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Russell 2000® Index. Its objective is daily and is not intended to deliver three times the index's cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOXL vs TNA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOXL vs TNA Cost
Overpaying TNA vs SOXL
$5,013
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOXL 0.75%
$14,482
TNA 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOXL | TNA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,847 | $511 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $6,927 | $1,849 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $19,495 | $5,013 |
- 0.75%SOXL, cheaper
- 1.05%TNA
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
SOXL cheapest of 30 funds
TNA 25th cheapest of 30 funds
SOXL vs TNA Dividends
- SOXL 0.12%
- TNA 0.31%, better
- SOXL $0.09
- TNA $0.18
- SOXL $0.09
- TNA $0.04
- SOXL Sep 22, 2026
- TNA Sep 22, 2026
- SOXL Sep 29, 2026
- TNA Sep 29, 2026
- SOXL Annual
- TNA Quarterly
Distribution history
SOXL vs TNA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOXL
- TNA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOXL 137.2%TNA 58.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SOXL 0.90, betterTNA 0.75
- Worst fall
- SOXL −90.5%TNA −82.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SOXL 7.64TNA 3.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.