TQQQ ranks 1st and TNA 20th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
TNA vs TQQQ
TQQQ −0.27pt a year
1.05%0.78%
TQQQ 13.3×the volume
4.32M57.5M
TQQQ +32.1pt
+5.8%+37.9%
TNA vs TQQQ Performance
−35.5%+64.2%
- TNA 1.05%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- TNA $1.4B
- TQQQ $32.1B
- TNA +24.0%, better
- TQQQ +7.1%
- TNA 0.31%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- TNA 12
- TQQQ 116
- TNA 4.32M sh
- TQQQ 57.5M sh, better
- TNA $60.85
- TQQQ $61.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TNA | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B57 | B57 |
| Tradability | B67 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B63 | A79Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. TNA and TQQQ are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TNAC
TQQQA
In short
TNA Three times the Russell 2000's daily move, run by the same fund since November 2008. In a category full of sector bets, this one is a straight leveraged play on US small caps.
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
TNA The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Russell 2000® Index. Its objective is daily and is not intended to deliver three times the index's cumulative return over periods longer than one day.
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TNA vs TQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TNA vs TQQQ Cost
Overpaying TNA vs TQQQ
$4,493
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TNA 1.05%
$19,495
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TNA | TQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,388 | $459 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $5,268 | $1,659 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $15,002 | $4,493 |
- 1.05%TNA
- 0.78%TQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
TNA 25th cheapest of 30 funds
TNA vs TQQQ Dividends
- TNA 0.31%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- TNA $0.18
- TQQQ $0.48
- TNA $0.04
- TQQQ $0.16
- TNA Sep 22, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- TNA Sep 29, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- TNA Quarterly
- TQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
TNA vs TQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TNA
- TQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TNA 58.6%TQQQ 56.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- TNA 0.75TQQQ 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- TNA −82.4%TQQQ −81.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- TNA 3.84TQQQ 3.71
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.