TRFM ranks 3rd and TEC 16th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
TEC vs TRFM
TRFM −0.20pt a year
0.69%0.49%
TRFM 100.4×the volume
39940.1K
TEC vs TRFM Performance
+7.2%+5.8%
- TEC 0.69%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- TEC $6M
- TRFM $313M
- TEC +7.2%, better
- TRFM +5.8%
- TEC 44
- TRFM 266
- TEC 399 sh
- TRFM 40.1K sh, better
- TEC $31.68
- TRFM $53.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TEC | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B65 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A89Higher |
| Durability | F17 | C50Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. TEC and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TECC
TRFMA
In short
TEC A stock-picker's swing at disruptive tech. Harbor hands the keys to Jennison, whose team runs a concentrated, go-anywhere book of roughly 40 names tied to transformative technology. Active conviction, not an index screen.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
TEC The Fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies across any sector whose growth potential is tied to transformative technologies. These technologies use innovation to change how consumers, businesses, or industries operate.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TEC vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TEC vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying TEC vs TRFM
$3,637
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TEC 0.69%
$13,429
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TEC | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $883 | $349 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,394 | $1,303 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,792 | $3,637 |
- 0.69%TEC
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
TEC 18th cheapest of 30 funds
TEC vs TRFM Dividends
- TEC None
- TRFM
- TEC
- TRFM $0.08
- TEC
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- TEC
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- TEC
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
TEC vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TEC 23.6%TRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- TEC 1.07TRFM 1.02
- Worst fall
- TEC −17.5%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- TEC 1.61TRFM 1.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.