XITK ranks 4th and TEC 16th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
TEC vs XITK
XITK −0.24pt a year
0.69%0.45%
XITK 5.4×the volume
3992.15K
TEC vs XITK Performance
+7.2%+0.6%
- TEC 0.69%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- TEC $6M
- XITK $67M
- TEC +7.2%, better
- XITK +0.6%
- TEC
- XITK 0.00%
- TEC 44
- XITK 95
- TEC 399 sh
- XITK 2.15K sh, better
- TEC $31.68
- XITK $197.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TEC | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | D39 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A81Higher |
| Durability | F17 | A73Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. TEC and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TECC
XITKA
In short
TEC A stock-picker's swing at disruptive tech. Harbor hands the keys to Jennison, whose team runs a concentrated, go-anywhere book of roughly 40 names tied to transformative technology. Active conviction, not an index screen.
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
TEC The Fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies across any sector whose growth potential is tied to transformative technologies. These technologies use innovation to change how consumers, businesses, or industries operate.
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TEC vs XITK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TEC vs XITK Cost
Overpaying TEC vs XITK
$4,388
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TEC 0.69%
$13,429
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TEC | XITK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $812 | $420 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $3,128 | $1,569 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $9,041 | $4,388 |
- 0.69%TEC
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
TEC 18th cheapest of 30 funds
TEC vs XITK Dividends
- TEC
- XITK 0.00%
- TEC None
- XITK None
Distribution history
TEC vs XITK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TEC 23.6%XITK 25.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- TEC 1.07XITK 0.63
- Worst fall
- TEC −17.5%XITK −61.4%
- Market sensitivity
- TEC 1.61XITK 1.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.