TRFM ranks 3rd and YNOT 23rd of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
TRFM vs YNOT
TRFM −0.26pt a year
0.49%0.75%
YNOT 1.2×the volume
40.1K48.5K
TRFM vs YNOT Performance
+5.8%−0.4%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- YNOT 0.75%
- TRFM $313M
- YNOT $199M
- TRFM +5.8%, better
- YNOT −0.4%
- TRFM 266
- YNOT 107
- TRFM 40.1K sh
- YNOT 48.5K sh, better
- TRFM $53.79
- YNOT $29.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TRFM | YNOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | F22 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | C49 |
| Durability | C50Higher | D37 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. TRFM and YNOT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TRFMA
YNOTD
In short
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
YNOT Most innovation funds just buy the obvious winners. YNOT sorts emerging-tech companies into four phases, from the chipmakers enabling a technology to the businesses that eventually use it, and actively shifts money along that chain.
Stated mandate
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
YNOT The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of companies operating in digital and technology sectors, emphasizing firms involved in digital innovation and transformation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TRFM vs YNOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TRFM vs YNOT Cost
Overpaying YNOT vs TRFM
$4,690
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
YNOT 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TRFM | YNOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,336 | $453 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,078 | $1,684 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $14,482 | $4,690 |
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- 0.75%YNOT
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
YNOT 20th cheapest of 30 funds
TRFM vs YNOT Dividends
- TRFM
- YNOT None
- TRFM $0.08
- YNOT
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- YNOT
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- YNOT
- TRFM Irregular
- YNOT
Distribution history
TRFM vs YNOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TRFM 23.3%YNOT 25.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- TRFM 1.02YNOT 0.36
- Worst fall
- TRFM −28.4%YNOT −17.2%
- Market sensitivity
- TRFM 1.64YNOT 1.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.