TSLS ranks 3rd and TSLZ 14th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
TSLS vs TSLZ
TSLS −0.10pt a year
0.95%1.05%
TSLZ 8.1×the volume
304K2.47M
TSLS +39.0pt
−34.5%−73.5%
TSLS vs TSLZ Performance
+9.3%−14.3%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- TSLZ 1.05%
- TSLS $48M
- TSLZ $31M
- TSLS +9.3%, better
- TSLZ −14.3%
- TSLS 2.82%, better
- TSLZ 0.73%
- TSLS 5
- TSLZ 2
- TSLS 304K sh
- TSLZ 2.47M sh, better
- TSLS $58.05
- TSLZ $12.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TSLS | TSLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B65 |
| Mission | A87 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A76Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | C44 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B64 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. TSLS and TSLZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TSLSA
TSLZB
In short
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
TSLZ Shorting Tesla without a margin account. TSLZ uses swaps to aim for -2x Tesla's move each trading day, resets at the close, and is the cheaper of the two double-short Tesla funds. Built for day-scale trades, not the long haul.
Stated mandate
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
TSLZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to -200% of the daily performance of Tesla, Inc., before fees and expenses. It is intended as a short-term trading vehicle and is not designed to track Tesla over periods longer than one trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TSLS vs TSLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TSLS vs TSLZ Cost
Overpaying TSLZ vs TSLS
$1,626
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
TSLZ 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TSLS | TSLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,847 | $169 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,927 | $605 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,495 | $1,626 |
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- 1.05%TSLZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
TSLZ 20th cheapest of 43 funds
TSLS vs TSLZ Dividends
- TSLS 2.82%, better
- TSLZ 0.73%
- TSLS $1.57
- TSLZ $0.08
- TSLS $0.40
- TSLZ $0.08
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- TSLZ Dec 24, 2025
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- TSLZ Dec 26, 2025
- TSLS Quarterly
- TSLZ Annual
Distribution history
TSLS vs TSLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TSLS 51.7%, betterTSLZ 103.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- TSLS −0.76, betterTSLZ −0.87
- Worst fall
- TSLS −90.7%TSLZ −99.2%
- Market sensitivity
- TSLS −1.37TSLZ −2.32
TSLS and TSLZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
