USO ranks 4th and UGA 6th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.
UGA vs USO
USO −0.22pt a year
1.08%0.86%
USO 120.1×the volume
47.8K5.73M
UGA +11.1pt
+18.3%+7.2%
UGA vs USO Performance
+240.5%+195.4%
- UGA 1.08%
- USO 0.86%, better
- UGA $161M
- USO $1.95B
- UGA +120.5%
- USO +132.7%, better
- UGA 8
- USO 17
- UGA 47.8K sh
- USO 5.73M sh, better
- UGA $146.05
- USO $170.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | UGA | USO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | B65Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C45 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | C48 | A71Higher |
Rank among Energy Futures funds
Same Category. UGA and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
UGAC
USOB
In short
UGA Its energy-futures cohort is wall-to-wall crude. UGA aims at the refined stuff you actually pump, tracking front-month NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures inside a commodity pool that has run since 2008.
USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.
Stated mandate
UGA The fund seeks daily NAV percentage changes to reflect daily percentage changes in the spot price of RBOB gasoline for delivery to New York Harbor, measured through the Benchmark Futures Contract. It targets average daily tracking within plus or minus 10% over 30 successive valuation days.
USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
UGA vs USO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
UGA vs USO Cost
Overpaying UGA vs USO
$3,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
UGA 1.08%
$19,974
USO 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | UGA | USO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,898 | $1,525 | $373 |
| 20 | $7,106 | $5,768 | $1,338 |
| 30 | $19,974 | $16,368 | $3,606 |
- 1.08%UGA
- 0.86%USO, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Futures funds
- Median 1.01%
USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds
UGA 7th cheapest of 11 funds
UGA vs USO Dividends
- UGA None
- USO None
Distribution history
UGA vs USO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- UGA
- USO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- UGA 33.1%, betterUSO 43.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- UGA 0.85, betterUSO 0.71
- Worst fall
- UGA −38.1%USO −36.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- UGA 1.62USO 2.22
Popular comparisons
- 1.08% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





