Skip to content

UGA vs USO

United States Gasoline Fund, LP

UGACNYSE Arca

United States Oil Fund, LP

USOBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

USO −0.22pt a year

UGA1.08%USO0.86%

Avg volume · 30D

USO 120.1×the volume

UGA47.8KUSO5.73M

10Y return · a year

UGA +11.1pt

UGA+18.3%USO+7.2%

UGA vs USO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+240.5%UGA+195.4%USO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. UGA +240.5%. USO +195.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%100%150%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
UGA 1.08%
USO 0.86%, better
Fund size
UGA $161M
USO $1.95B
1Y total return
UGA +120.5%
USO +132.7%, better
Holdings
UGA 8
USO 17
Avg volume (30D)
UGA 47.8K sh
USO 5.73M sh, better
NAV per share
UGA $146.05
USO $170.39
52W range

ETF.net Grade

UGA: Cost 38, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 48. USO: Cost 65, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 100, Durability 71.
Pillar letters and Scores for UGA, USO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarUGAUSO
Cost30% weightD38B65Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherC43
Tradability15% weightC45A70Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA100
Durability5% weightC48A71Higher

Rank among Energy Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. UGA and USO are both graded against the same 11 Energy Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Futures⁠

Category · 11 funds
See all 11 ›

USO ranks 4th and UGA 6th of 11 funds in the Energy Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1AOILKProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2BDBEInvesco DB Energy FundScore 69
  3. Rank 3BDBOInvesco DB Oil FundScore 67
  4. Rank 4BUSOUnited States Oil Fund, LPScore 61
  5. Rank 5CUSLUnited States 12 Month Oil FundScore 51
  6. Rank 6CUGAUnited States Gasoline Fund, LPScore 47
  7. Rank 7CBNOUnited States Brent Oil Fund LPScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

UGACUnited States Gasoline Fund, LP

USOBUnited States Oil Fund, LP

In short

UGA Its energy-futures cohort is wall-to-wall crude. UGA aims at the refined stuff you actually pump, tracking front-month NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures inside a commodity pool that has run since 2008.

USO The original US crude oil ETF, trading since 2006 and still one of the busiest ways to get WTI exposure without opening a futures account. It holds oil futures near the front of the curve, not barrels in a tank.

Stated mandate

UGA The fund seeks daily NAV percentage changes to reflect daily percentage changes in the spot price of RBOB gasoline for delivery to New York Harbor, measured through the Benchmark Futures Contract. It targets average daily tracking within plus or minus 10% over 30 successive valuation days.

USO USO seeks daily NAV percentage changes that reflect changes in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, measured by the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, plus collateral interest and less expenses.

Why people hold it

  • UGA A direct line to pump fuel: the benchmark is the near-month NYMEX gasoline (RBOB) contract for New York Harbor delivery, rolling to the next month within two weeks of expiry.sec.govuscfinvestments.com
  • Trading since 2008 under the same passive mandate, so the mechanism has been through multiple gasoline booms and busts rather than being a new launch.
  • The prospectus puts a number on tracking: average daily NAV moves are targeted within plus or minus 10% of the benchmark's over 30 successive valuation days.sec.gov
  • USO Cheap for this corner of the market: 0.86% a year against a cohort median of 1.08%.
  • Live since 2006 and one of the most actively traded funds in its category, so bids and offers are usually there when you need them.
  • Targets daily moves in light, sweet crude delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, via its benchmark futures contract. No margin account, no expiries to roll yourself.sec.gov
  • Since April 2020 the portfolio has reached past pure front-month into later-dated contracts, a change the fund disclosed in its filings.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • UGA At 1.08%, fees land mid-pack among energy futures funds, while crude-focused peers such as OILK (0.69%) and USO (0.86%) charge less.
  • A commodity pool, not a 1099 fund: shareholders receive a Schedule K-1 at tax time, and the fund does not intend to pay cash distributions.uscfinvestments.comsec.gov
  • It trades lightly next to the big crude funds, and the front-month roll means it follows the futures curve, not the price on the sign at your local station.sec.gov
  • USO It's a commodity pool, so tax season brings a Schedule K-1 rather than a 1099. Peer OILK is built specifically to skip that paperwork.uscfinvestments.com
  • Futures, not barrels. Rolling contracts forward can cost when later months trade above nearer ones, which pulls results away from headline spot oil.sec.gov
  • One commodity, one price driver, and no income stream: the fund hasn't been paying distributions, so everything rides on the oil move.

Full UGA profile⁠

Full USO profile⁠

UGA vs USO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

UGA vs USO Cost

Overpaying UGA vs USO

$3,606

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • UGA 1.08%

    $19,974

  • USO 0.86%

    $16,368

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • UGA 1.08%
  • USO 0.86%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530UGA $19,974USO $16,368

Year by year

YearUGAUSOOverpaying
10$1,898$1,525$373
20$7,106$5,768$1,338
30$19,974$16,368$3,606

Expense ratio

  • 1.08%UGA
  • 0.86%USO, cheaper
  • Middle half of Energy Futures funds
  • Median 1.01%

USO 4th cheapest of 11 funds

UGA 7th cheapest of 11 funds

UGA vs USO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
UGA None
USO None

Distribution history

UGAAll UGA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

USOAll USO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UGA vs USO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • UGA
  • USO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: USO −36.2% · Mar 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
UGA 33.1%, betterUSO 43.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
UGA 0.85, betterUSO 0.71
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
UGA −38.1%USO −36.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
UGA 1.62USO 2.22

Popular comparisons

  • UGACvsOILKA

    United States Gasoline Fund, LP · ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.08% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USOBvsOILKA

    United States Oil Fund, LP · ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UGACvsDBEB

    United States Gasoline Fund, LP · Invesco DB Energy Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.08% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USOBvsDBEB

    United States Oil Fund, LP · Invesco DB Energy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UGACvsDBOB

    United States Gasoline Fund, LP · Invesco DB Oil Fund

    Expense ratio
    1.08% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USOBvsDBOB

    United States Oil Fund, LP · Invesco DB Oil Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.