Skip to content

ACES vs IBAT

ALPS Clean Energy ETF

ACESCNYSE Arca

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

IBATBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

IBAT −0.08pt a year

ACES0.55%IBAT0.47%

Avg volume · 30D

ACES 2.2×the volume

ACES51.9KIBAT23.8K

ACES vs IBAT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−23.6%ACES+12.9%IBAT

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. ACES −23.6%. IBAT +12.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ACES 0.55%
IBAT 0.47%, better
Fund size
ACES $87M
IBAT $56M
1Y total return
ACES −23.6%
IBAT +12.9%, better
Yield (12M)
ACES 0.70%
IBAT 0.85%, better
Holdings
ACES 38
IBAT 97
Avg volume (30D)
ACES 51.9K sh, better
IBAT 23.8K sh
NAV per share
ACES $25.98
IBAT $35.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACES: Cost 60, Risk 28, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 59, Durability 49. IBAT: Cost 83, Risk 74, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 56, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACES, IBAT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACESIBAT
Cost30% weightB60A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD28A74Higher
Tradability15% weightB60HigherD37
Holdings10% weightB59HigherB56
Durability5% weightC49HigherD36

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACES and IBAT are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

IBAT ranks 4th and ACES 7th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BFANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 6BQCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index FundScore 55
  7. Rank 7CACESALPS Clean Energy ETFScore 52
  8. Rank 8CPBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACESCALPS Clean Energy ETF

IBATBiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

In short

ACES Most clean energy funds cast a global net. This one stays on the continent: a passive, roughly 40-stock index of U.S. and Canadian renewables and clean tech, running since 2018.

IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.

Stated mandate

ACES ACES seeks to track the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing to provide exposure to U.S. and Canadian companies involved in renewables and clean technology.

IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Why people hold it

  • ACES North America only. The index holds U.S. and Canadian renewables and clean-tech names, so no Europe or Asia exposure sneaks in through the back door.alpsfunds.com
  • Fee sits below the median for clean energy ETFs at 0.55%, and undercuts narrower plays like FAN (0.61%).
  • Straightforward plumbing: a passive fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, live since 2018, with quarterly distributions.
  • IBAT 0.47% a year, cheaper than Global X's DRIV (0.68%) and Amplify's BATT (0.59%).
  • Buys the storage layer, not the showroom: battery technology, hydrogen, fuel cells and the materials that feed them.ishares.com
  • Global mandate, roughly 80 holdings: miners, chemical firms and equipment makers a US large-cap index never touches.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its battery and EV thematic group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • ACES Roughly 40 stocks in one policy-sensitive theme. Concentration cuts both ways, and this has been one of the more volatile profiles in its clean energy peer group.
  • Cheaper doors into the theme exist: ICLN and FRNW both charge 0.39%, though both track global rather than North America indexes.
  • Moderately traded rather than a category heavyweight, so bid-ask spreads matter more here than in the most-traded clean energy funds.
  • IBAT One theme, one supply chain. Battery and materials demand drives the whole basket in the same direction at the same time.
  • BlackRock applies business involvement screens, so the portfolio is a filtered slice of the industry rather than the full map.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Not an income holding.

Full ACES profile⁠

Full IBAT profile⁠

ACES vs IBAT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACES vs IBAT Cost

Overpaying ACES vs IBAT

$1,486

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACES 0.55%

    $10,904

  • IBAT 0.47%

    $9,418

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACES 0.55%
  • IBAT 0.47%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530ACES $10,904IBAT $9,418

Year by year

YearACESIBATOverpaying
10$988$847$141
20$3,790$3,261$529
30$10,904$9,418$1,486

Expense ratio

  • 0.55%ACES
  • 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds

ACES 7th cheapest of 16 funds

ACES vs IBAT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACES 0.70%
IBAT 0.85%, better
Payout (12M)
ACES $0.19
IBAT $0.30
Last payment
ACES $0.07
IBAT $0.18
Ex-dividend
ACES Sep 17, 2026
IBAT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
ACES Sep 22, 2026
IBAT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
ACES Quarterly
IBAT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

ACESQuarterly · 31 paymentsAll ACES payments⁠
One bar per payment. 31 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2018 $0.08; Mar 21, 2019 $0.12; Jun 20, 2019 $0.19; Sep 19, 2019 $0.16; Dec 19, 2019 $0.14; Mar 19, 2020 $0.15; Jun 18, 2020 $0.12; Sep 17, 2020 $0.10; Dec 22, 2020 $0.08; Mar 18, 2021 $0.05; Jun 17, 2021 $0.18; Sep 23, 2021 $0.11; Dec 22, 2021 $0.12; Mar 24, 2022 $0.06; Jun 23, 2022 $0.13; Sep 22, 2022 $0.15; Dec 22, 2022 $0.16; Mar 23, 2023 $0.06; Jun 22, 2023 $0.14; Sep 21, 2023 $0.14; Dec 21, 2023 $0.18; Jun 20, 2024 $0.08; Sep 19, 2024 $0.09; Dec 19, 2024 $0.11; Mar 20, 2025 $0.01; Jun 20, 2025 $0.02; Sep 18, 2025 $0.10; Dec 18, 2025 $0.09; Mar 19, 2026 $0.01; Jun 18, 2026 $0.02; Sep 17, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.20202020232026YTD
IBATTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll IBAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 11, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.20202020232026YTD

ACES vs IBAT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACES 30.5%IBAT 30.2%since Apr 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACES −0.11IBAT 0.48since Apr 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACES −74.2%IBAT −28.2%since Mar 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACES 1.46IBAT 1.57

ACES and IBAT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ACESCvsICLNA

    ALPS Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsICLNA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACESCvsFRNWA

    ALPS Clean Energy ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsFRNWA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACESCvsCNRGB

    ALPS Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsCNRGB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.