FELG ranks 4th and ACGR 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ACGR vs FELG
FELG −0.21pt a year
0.39%0.18%
FELG 1469.0×the volume
258379K
ACGR vs FELG Performance
−1.2%−0.5%
- ACGR 0.39%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- ACGR $10M
- FELG $5.78B
- ACGR −1.2%
- FELG −0.5%, better
- ACGR 0.11%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- ACGR 91
- FELG 133
- ACGR 258 sh
- FELG 379K sh, better
- ACGR $66.57
- FELG $42.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACGR | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | C43 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | F5 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C50 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ACGR and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACGRC
FELGA
In short
ACGR A disciplined take on US growth: roughly 80 stocks chosen by a model that weighs growth, momentum and value together, with sustainability factors built in, at 0.39% (cheap for active).
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
Stated mandate
ACGR Seeks capital appreciation and aims to exceed its benchmark over a market cycle through a U.S. growth-equity strategy that incorporates sustainability factors.
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACGR vs FELG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACGR vs FELG Cost
Overpaying ACGR vs FELG
$4,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACGR 0.39%
$7,898
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACGR | FELG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $328 | $377 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $1,281 | $1,444 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $3,749 | $4,149 |
- 0.39%ACGR
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
ACGR 14th cheapest of 90 funds
ACGR vs FELG Dividends
- ACGR 0.11%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- ACGR $0.07
- FELG $0.16
- ACGR $0.04
- FELG $0.04
- ACGR Jun 9, 2026
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- ACGR Jun 11, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- ACGR Quarterly
- FELG Quarterly
Distribution history
ACGR vs FELG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACGR 16.5%FELG 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACGR 0.88FELG 0.93
- Worst fall
- ACGR −34.5%FELG −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ACGR 1.09FELG 1.23
ACGR and FELG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
