JUSA ranks 1st and ACGR 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ACGR vs JUSA
JUSA −0.21pt a year
0.39%0.18%
JUSA 382.8×the volume
25898.8K
ACGR vs JUSA Performance
−1.2%+10.8%
- ACGR 0.39%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- ACGR $10M
- JUSA $745M
- ACGR −1.2%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- ACGR 0.11%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- ACGR 91
- JUSA 263
- ACGR 258 sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- ACGR $66.57
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACGR | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | C43 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | F5 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ACGR and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACGRC
JUSAA
In short
ACGR A disciplined take on US growth: roughly 80 stocks chosen by a model that weighs growth, momentum and value together, with sustainability factors built in, at 0.39% (cheap for active).
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ACGR Seeks capital appreciation and aims to exceed its benchmark over a market cycle through a U.S. growth-equity strategy that incorporates sustainability factors.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACGR vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACGR vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying ACGR vs JUSA
$4,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACGR 0.39%
$7,898
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACGR | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $328 | $377 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $1,281 | $1,444 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $3,749 | $4,149 |
- 0.39%ACGR
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
ACGR 14th cheapest of 90 funds
ACGR vs JUSA Dividends
- ACGR 0.11%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- ACGR $0.07
- JUSA $0.49
- ACGR $0.04
- JUSA $0.13
- ACGR Jun 9, 2026
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- ACGR Jun 11, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- ACGR Quarterly
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
ACGR vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACGR 16.5%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACGR 0.88JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- ACGR −34.5%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- ACGR 1.09JUSA 0.98
ACGR and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

