GUSE ranks 2nd and ACGR 38th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ACGR vs GUSE
GUSE −0.09pt a year
0.39%0.30%
GUSE 96.5×the volume
25824.9K
ACGR vs GUSE Performance
+1.0%+11.8%
- ACGR 0.39%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- ACGR $10M
- GUSE $421M
- ACGR −1.2%
- GUSE
- ACGR 0.11%
- GUSE
- ACGR 91
- GUSE 122
- ACGR 258 sh
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- ACGR $66.57
- GUSE $46.05
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACGR | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | F5 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ACGR and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACGRC
GUSEA
In short
ACGR A disciplined take on US growth: roughly 80 stocks chosen by a model that weighs growth, momentum and value together, with sustainability factors built in, at 0.39% (cheap for active).
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
ACGR Seeks capital appreciation and aims to exceed its benchmark over a market cycle through a U.S. growth-equity strategy that incorporates sustainability factors.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACGR vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACGR vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying ACGR vs GUSE
$1,749
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACGR 0.39%
$7,898
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACGR | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $545 | $160 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,113 | $612 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $6,149 | $1,749 |
- 0.39%ACGR
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
ACGR 14th cheapest of 90 funds
ACGR vs GUSE Dividends
- ACGR 0.11%
- GUSE
- ACGR $0.07
- GUSE
- ACGR $0.04
- GUSE $0.30
- ACGR Jun 9, 2026
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- ACGR Jun 11, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- ACGR Quarterly
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
ACGR vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACGR 16.5%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- ACGR 0.88GUSE
- Worst fall
- ACGR −34.5%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- ACGR 1.09GUSE 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.