ROM ranks 3rd and AIBU 33rd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
AIBU vs ROM
ROM −0.03pt a year
0.96%0.93%
ROM 7.9×the volume
6.04K47.7K
AIBU vs ROM Performance
−5.8%+26.5%
- AIBU 0.96%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- AIBU $24M
- ROM $1.15B
- AIBU −5.8%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- AIBU 1.82%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- AIBU 38
- ROM 85
- AIBU 6.04K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- AIBU $65.26
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIBU | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D38 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. AIBU and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIBUC
ROMA
In short
AIBU The leveraged AI trade spread across a basket instead of one chip name: AIBU targets 200% of the daily move of a roughly 40-stock US AI and big-data index, resetting every trading day.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
AIBU The Fund seeks 200% of the Solactive US AI & Big Data Index’s daily performance before fees and expenses, resetting its target each trading day. It is not designed to deliver 200% of the index over periods other than one trading day.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIBU vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIBU vs ROM Cost
Overpaying AIBU vs ROM
$495
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIBU 0.96%
$18,034
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIBU | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,644 | $51 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,199 | $184 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $17,539 | $495 |
- 0.96%AIBU
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
AIBU 66th cheapest of 95 funds
AIBU vs ROM Dividends
- AIBU 1.82%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- AIBU $1.06
- ROM $0.04
- AIBU $1.06
- ROM $0.02
- AIBU Dec 10, 2025
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- AIBU Dec 17, 2025
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- AIBU Twice a year
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
AIBU vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIBU 57.1%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AIBU 0.83ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- AIBU −51.2%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AIBU 4.22ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.