NTSX ranks 1st and ALLW 5th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
ALLW vs NTSX
NTSX −0.63pt a year
0.85%0.22%
ALLW 13.3×the volume
572K42.9K
ALLW vs NTSX Performance
+5.9%+7.5%
- ALLW 0.85%
- NTSX 0.22%, better
- ALLW $1.84B
- NTSX $1.34B
- ALLW +5.9%
- NTSX +7.5%, better
- ALLW
- NTSX 1.07%
- ALLW 40
- NTSX 504
- ALLW 572K sh, better
- NTSX 42.9K sh
- ALLW $29.17
- NTSX $58.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ALLW | NTSX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A77 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | B64 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | A72 |
| Holdings | B66 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A93Higher |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. ALLW and NTSX are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ALLWB
NTSXA
In short
ALLW Bridgewater's All Weather framework in a SPDR wrapper: global stocks, nominal and inflation-linked bonds, and commodities in one ticker, built around contractions and inflation spikes, not just bull markets.
NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.
Stated mandate
ALLW The ETF seeks resilience across varied market conditions, including economic contractions and elevated inflation, through diversified exposure to global equities, nominal and inflation-linked bonds, and commodities.
NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ALLW vs NTSX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ALLW vs NTSX Cost
Overpaying ALLW vs NTSX
$11,641
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ALLW 0.85%
$16,199
NTSX 0.22%
$4,558
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ALLW | NTSX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $401 | $1,107 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $1,561 | $4,145 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $4,558 | $11,641 |
- 0.85%ALLW
- 0.22%NTSX, cheaper
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
ALLW 12th cheapest of 19 funds
ALLW vs NTSX Dividends
- ALLW
- NTSX 1.07%
- ALLW
- NTSX $0.63
- ALLW $1.29
- NTSX $0.16
- ALLW Dec 29, 2025
- NTSX Sep 25, 2026
- ALLW Dec 31, 2025
- NTSX Sep 29, 2026
- ALLW Irregular
- NTSX Quarterly
Distribution history
ALLW vs NTSX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ALLW 10.0%NTSX 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ALLW 0.86NTSX 1.28
- Worst fall
- ALLW −8.8%NTSX −31.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ALLW 0.42NTSX 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.