CTAP ranks 2nd and ALLW 5th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
ALLW vs CTAP
CTAP −0.72pt a year
0.85%0.13%
ALLW 6.6×the volume
572K86.8K
ALLW vs CTAP Performance
+5.7%+21.5%
- ALLW 0.85%
- CTAP 0.13%, better
- ALLW $1.84B
- CTAP $167M
- ALLW +6.2%
- CTAP
- ALLW 40
- CTAP 42
- ALLW 572K sh, better
- CTAP 86.8K sh
- ALLW $29.17
- CTAP $30.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ALLW | CTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | B66Higher | C42 |
| Durability | A79Higher | B59 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. ALLW and CTAP are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ALLWB
CTAPA
In short
ALLW Bridgewater's All Weather framework in a SPDR wrapper: global stocks, nominal and inflation-linked bonds, and commodities in one ticker, built around contractions and inflation spikes, not just bull markets.
CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.
Stated mandate
ALLW The ETF seeks resilience across varied market conditions, including economic contractions and elevated inflation, through diversified exposure to global equities, nominal and inflation-linked bonds, and commodities.
CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ALLW vs CTAP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ALLW vs CTAP Cost
Overpaying ALLW vs CTAP
$13,473
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ALLW 0.85%
$16,199
CTAP 0.13%
$2,726
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ALLW | CTAP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $238 | $1,270 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $930 | $4,776 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $2,726 | $13,473 |
- 0.85%ALLW
- 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
CTAP cheapest of 19 funds
ALLW 12th cheapest of 19 funds
ALLW vs CTAP Dividends
- ALLW $1.29
- CTAP $0.30
- ALLW Dec 29, 2025
- CTAP Sep 25, 2026
- ALLW Dec 31, 2025
- CTAP Sep 30, 2026
- ALLW Irregular
- CTAP Quarterly
Distribution history
ALLW vs CTAP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ALLW 10.0%CTAP
- Return per unit of risk
- ALLW 0.86CTAP
- Worst fall
- ALLW −8.8%CTAP
- Market sensitivity
- ALLW 0.42CTAP 1.34
ALLW and CTAP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.13% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


