NTSI ranks 4th and ALLW 5th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
ALLW vs NTSI
NTSI −0.57pt a year
0.85%0.28%
ALLW 30.3×the volume
572K18.9K
ALLW vs NTSI Performance
+5.9%+10.4%
- ALLW 0.85%
- NTSI 0.28%, better
- ALLW $1.84B
- NTSI $488M
- ALLW +5.9%
- NTSI +10.4%, better
- ALLW
- NTSI 3.11%
- ALLW 40
- NTSI 458
- ALLW 572K sh, better
- NTSI 18.9K sh
- ALLW $29.17
- NTSI $46.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ALLW | NTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | B66 | A82Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | A70 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. ALLW and NTSI are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ALLWB
NTSIB
In short
ALLW Bridgewater's All Weather framework in a SPDR wrapper: global stocks, nominal and inflation-linked bonds, and commodities in one ticker, built around contractions and inflation spikes, not just bull markets.
NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.
Stated mandate
ALLW The ETF seeks resilience across varied market conditions, including economic contractions and elevated inflation, through diversified exposure to global equities, nominal and inflation-linked bonds, and commodities.
NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ALLW vs NTSI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ALLW vs NTSI Cost
Overpaying ALLW vs NTSI
$10,444
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ALLW 0.85%
$16,199
NTSI 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ALLW | NTSI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $509 | $999 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $1,976 | $3,730 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $5,755 | $10,444 |
- 0.85%ALLW
- 0.28%NTSI, cheaper
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
NTSI 4th cheapest of 19 funds
ALLW 12th cheapest of 19 funds
ALLW vs NTSI Dividends
- ALLW
- NTSI 3.11%
- ALLW
- NTSI $1.45
- ALLW $1.29
- NTSI $0.01
- ALLW Dec 29, 2025
- NTSI Sep 25, 2026
- ALLW Dec 31, 2025
- NTSI Sep 29, 2026
- ALLW Irregular
- NTSI Quarterly
Distribution history
ALLW vs NTSI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ALLW 10.0%NTSI 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ALLW 0.86NTSI 0.99
- Worst fall
- ALLW −8.8%NTSI −33.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ALLW 0.42NTSI 0.93
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.